It's easy for an instructor to set aside what you think you know. He just says, watch me and you copy. Seeing destroys mental blocks. Trying to differentiate your mind is Zen. Good luck! I respect Spider for his effort in helping others and if that's the level you want to attain, that's setting a personal goal based on empirical evidence. I respect Neoxx for all his effort. I expect he too in time will get close to that level. However from his praise of SCT I can see he expects nirvana. I do not respect Jack for outlandish claims for SCT that are verging on lunacy. There is zero empirical evidence and Jack refuses to walk the walk. It is badly flawed an totally impossible to achieve what Jack claims by using SCT. That is not an opinion. It is a fact that no one can disprove because it is... a fact. It is possible to do x3, but never by using Jack's SCT. Will Jack or anyone prove me wrong? Just one day X3 live? That's asking for empirical proof.
Hey I'll not argue over the understanding. I have things that work and I have little or no idea why they work. All I know is they work. Over and over they work. So SCT does x3? Show me the empirical proof - please. I'll buy you lunch
In other words, this whole thing appears to me to be a case of channel RTL breach prior to sequence completion simply requires a slight 'fan' of the trend channel in order to accomodate the changing slope of the money velocity.
Actually the record is 6X, set by Spyder if I'm not mistaken, on a non-trending day, if I'm not mistaken. Now the question is knowing what you know about the method, is it possible for an expert/meta-expert practitioner of the JHM to do that? You've already answered that. I haven't though and my answer is unequivocally, 'yes'. Can I do such a thing right now? No, but I'm working on it and when I do it, I'll print my blotter and then you may buy me lunch, as long as it is rigorously non-vegan. lj
I have obtained the proof that is sufficient for me by studying the charts. The measure of sufficiency may be different for you, which is OK by me.
He did work with CFerret here: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...579&perpage=30&highlight=cferret&pagenumber=5
That was such a great post romanus. I looked at that sucker for a long time trying to figure out what he was saying to you. As I said last night I believe it is a 'transitional lateral' where the dominance changes within the lateral. His Gaussian profile shows a change in 'red' sentiment and I know I've heard him talk about the idea that a change in nondom (in this case 'red' dom to 'red' nondom) signifies a coming change in dom, which is what happened. On the other hand as we move out of the lateral and up the traverse there are a couple of intriguing things going on, e.g., the pair of B2B's and the black up - black down Gaussian peak which does NOT go on to a traverse sentiment change, presumably due to lack of traverse sequence completion. There may have been a sentiment flip/reflip on a faster fractal though. I'm still thinking about his B2B assignments. Now I see you've answered my long blab from last PM, so having finished chanting and whirling about, I'm going to have lunch with yoohoo and go carefully over what you have said. Talk with you later. lj