Spydertrader, if you'd be so kind - could you check the gaussian annotations and tape drawings in the images above. I attempted to annotate it in hindsight to fit the actual traverse today to see if it might shed the light on why it developed the way it developed. Thank you.
dkm included the link to Spyders coloring convention in his previous post. I have been using an annotation coloring scheme and I have been trying to maintain consistency with it. I will include it here from lowest fractal to highest for which I monitor on a 5M chart (line weighting is from thinnest to thickest): Code: Fractal 0 (Tapes): Thin Orange Thin Green Fractal 1 (FFF): Orange Green Thinnest Gaussian weighting Fractal 2 (FF): Purple Medium Weight Gaussian Fractal 3 (5M ES Traverse): Green (Pt 3 labelled) Red (PT3 labelled) Thick Weight Gaussian Fractal 4 (Channel): Blue I have attached my debrief chart using this scheme.
1. Without a view of your entire day (or at least the Traverse to which you refer), how should someone go about the task of guessing how you viewed the specific traverse in question. 2. If you wanted to annotate a Traverse, your gaussians do not match. 3. If you wanted to annotate something other than a Traverse, the Gaussians still do not match. - Spydertrader