No worries. Just looked at your profile and realized you're much more familiar with these methods than I had realized. Hope I didn't come across as aloof or patronizing!
You chart annotation looks thorough, however (maybe it's my eyes), its tough to see in detail. This brings up a suggestion for all of us and that is to post AM charts and PM charts. Spyder did this for a while. It might make it easier to see the details. Just a suggestion. Another comment, while I'm at it, I like when people post text comments on their charts pointing out things that others may or may not see or areas that caused one some consternation. This might bring a richer debriefing experience to all. Again, just suggestions.
Good thoughts dubyah. Another point that dkm touched on is to use the Spyderian format for channels and Gaussians. It tells people what you think you have be it a tape , a fftraverse, a traverse or a channel and what level of Gaussian you are depicting. I forget where Spyder posted this but perhaps dkm knows. Again, a suggestion only. lj