Iterative Refinement

Thanks for your response, but in my view you annotated the notorious "faster fractal" there as opposed to a full traverse. Consequently, we had yet to create a "traverse level traverse" so to speak. So 10:20 wasn't the end of a traverse, but the Pt2 of of the up traverse w/ 11:00 the Pt3.

As always I hold wide open the possibility I am wrong about this analysis. If so, how?

 

Try including yesterday along with today to arrive at the correct answer.

Try including a chart with your question.

- Spydertrader

 

edit: Gaussians represent what I believe is a FF in the a.m.

 

revised

 

Better.

However, Gausians should match that which builds the Traverse. Otherwise, your Gaussians would match a different fractal than your trading fractal. Of course, one can annotate all the trading fractals if one chooses.

- Spydertrader

 

This was my take on the period. Most of it, in terms of general moves, I had roughly mapped out before the session began, which is at least encouraging for my PFC. Still need to develop more confidence, though - and at the right times.

Comments appreciated (from anyone.)

- palinuro

 

Revision 2

I didn't finish fixing the Gaussian's from earlier

 

I always thought the gaussian peaks and valleys should be aligned with the pt1's, p2's and pt3's of the fractal you're annotating... have I gotten that all wrong too? I had a hard time seeing (edit: believing in) the fanned out traverse, since the actual increasing black volume didn't show up until 50 minutes after the 11:00 pt3 (so I removed it at first, put it back there now just because you all have it ). Before that there was increasing red, not something to strengthen the beliefs in point 3's for those faint at heart.

All times [close off].

 

You would be wise not to use my efforts as a guide either way.

 

And don't you listen to me, of course gaussian peaks and valleys can be somewhat off. What was I thinking .