Iterative Refinement

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Spydertrader, Jan 3, 2008.

  1. Tums

    Tums

    and yet... there are always people who wants to go off the reserve, quoting 3rd party posts, then coming back to demand a clarification. WTF ?!?!
     
    #10021     Dec 8, 2008
  2. morning chart, gotta go to work :mad:
     
    #10022     Dec 8, 2008
  3. afternoon, had serious drawig tool malfunctions, had to shut down early.

    Tape drawing questions:
    up tape, close outside rtl but higher high and low, FAN?

    internals inside a tape, start new tape?

    tape drawing still seems more of an art than a binary procedure, should it be totally binary?
     
    #10023     Dec 8, 2008
  4. I am anxious to see how others annotated the OB at15:40 :D
     
    #10024     Dec 8, 2008
  5. ehorn

    ehorn

    My view of the day... Got tripped up a bit in midday fractal jumping and the gaussians show it (I am sure) :)

    Time to debrief.
     
    #10025     Dec 8, 2008
  6. Great job, R/R - you beat me to the punch. I had similar thoughts to yours in regards to Spyder's riddle, and I was also concerned about the location of the down channel's P2. I've been trying to find a context such that the P2 at 1335 on 12/4/08 was not the "real" P2, and that the "real" down channel P2 occurred at 1535 on 12/4/08 when the forming down channel accelerated out of the previous up channel (pink in the attached). If you look at my medium level Gaussans you can see proper volume cycling for a full ES-only non-dominant up traverse from 1545 on 12/4 to 945 on 12/5. Then we get the maroon down traverse to complete the accelerated pink down channel. However, I cannot find a way to annotate an ES-only dominant traverse from 1440-1540, which means the first leg of the accelerated channel is incomplete. So I too remain confused as to how to reconcile the fact that P2 of the down channel appears to be inside of the previous up channel.

    Edit: I just realized I accidentally deleted the decreasing red medium-level Gaussian from 1440 EST to 1455 EST (1340-1355 CST on the attached chart).
     
    #10026     Dec 8, 2008
  7. tobbe

    tobbe

    Chart for today. I'm not up to par with the current annotation convention (it makes me confused). If my charts annotated using the 'old style' is confusing for you, please let me know and I'll stop posting them. Not that they wouldn't be confusing whatever the annotation style used :D .
     
    #10027     Dec 8, 2008
  8. ...
     
    #10028     Dec 8, 2008
  9. nkhoi

    nkhoi

    I have the same
    [​IMG]
     
    #10029     Dec 8, 2008
  10. I still need to debrief. I'm not excited about my annotations for the first part of the day, with the accelerated CO traverse followed quickly by a fan. I probably missed something but the green, the gray and the maroon all look like valid ES-only traverses to me.
     
    #10030     Dec 8, 2008