Italy

Discussion in 'Economics' started by farmerjohn1324, Apr 4, 2020.

  1. southall

    southall

    When they map it to the general population you get a 1% death rate.
     
    #21     Apr 4, 2020
  2. southall

    southall

    For the US i would say:

    Without any lockdowns or social distancing 200 million infections, 2m dead
    With poorly implemented lockdowns 20 million infections, 200K dead.
    With very successful lockdowns 2 million infected 20K dead.
     
    #22     Apr 4, 2020
  3. Turveyd

    Turveyd

    0.05% with functioning hospital care, if not less.

    So less, having to fudge numbers in the UK, Midlands 60x60miles, less than 10 C19 hospital admissions today, bet they still claim 4000+ tomorrow new cases.

    Screwed up the economy, can't admit it's over pretty much nothing.

    Waiting on the ONS figures ( Weekly Death Statistics WE 27th March ) to be uploaded, our guess is very small change in over all deaths, but strangely much less heart attacks and other deaths as they've been slotted in the C19 column.
     
    #23     Apr 4, 2020
  4. Turveyd

    Turveyd

    I'd like to remind you, you have ZERO proof of this, ZERO, you can't keep posting that as if it's fact, look at Sweden, no lockdowns looks identical to your chart.

    It doesn't work that way, AGAIN, we are all going to get it, 100% of us on the damn planet, well over 2Mil in the USA have it already, more like 60Mil.

    Why are you incapable of taking on and understanding Italy's testing ?? they've just said 25x's to high on the estimates your still for some reason using. In this very thread FFS!!
     
    #24     Apr 4, 2020
  5. southall

    southall

    Sweden have started to change that policy after they had more fatalities than Denmark, Norway & Finland combined.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2020
    #25     Apr 4, 2020
  6. I say we let them figure it out for themselves. Being old is their own fault.
     
    #26     Apr 4, 2020
  7. southall

    southall

    The US could of just denied anyone who needs hospital treatment for CV and let nature run its course.

    Keep the economy running. Don't allow anyone to stop work unless they have heavy symptoms.

    Worst case:
    2 million dead and 20 million ill at home for a while. Another 180 million infected with mild or no symptoms. Another 130 million don't even get infected at all after we reach herd immunity.

    Everyone needs to harden the fuck up, life goes on. It's not exactly a Nuclear holocaust if 2 million (mostly) oldies die and another 20 million get ill.

    But we have taken the compassionate snowflake option instead, at the price of killing the economy.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2020
    #27     Apr 4, 2020
  8. Turveyd

    Turveyd

    Your numbers ofcourse still well off, that's the FEAR numbers.

    But your not a snowflake good, maybe a psychopath but hey, prefer to a snowflake.

    Life isn't going on with this cure, life is very much put on hold for Billions of us on the planet all at once.

    Single Nuke, could kill 100% of NYC in a split second, that's 9Mil dead.

    When you realise the worst case is 1/25th of that, then it becomes a lot easier to carry on regardless, which is why there over inflating the numbers, to force the world into lockdowns and economic suicide.
     
    #28     Apr 4, 2020
  9. You're not a "snowflake" to worry about something that can kill you. It's common sense.

     
    #29     Apr 4, 2020
  10. Turveyd

    Turveyd

    I'll add, lockdowns haven't kicked in yet and still zero patients lining up, maybe it'll start in the next few days, loads off ill with it, none that seriously head politicians included, but looks like it's over for us.

    Deaths where 88 on Tuesday, before they started cheating so dropping fast, real numbers likely only 2000 people from actual C19 complications, that's 0.003% of population.

    Converts to 90K americans but your taking it harder I'd admit, with treatment.
     
    #30     Apr 4, 2020