It would take an ‘immaculate conception’ to create bear market in stocks right now: analyst

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by trader99, Oct 15, 2017.

  1. Millionaire

    Millionaire

    The last world war involved nukes.
     
    #11     Oct 15, 2017
  2. Simples

    Simples

    The last world war ended with nukes. Multiple sides using nukes and targetting nuclear power plants can easily destroy most what we take for granted today.
     
    #12     Oct 15, 2017
    Overnight likes this.
  3. Overnight

    Overnight


    The last world war was not a nuclear war, as Simples has mentioned. A nuclear war would have a vastly different impact on the markets.
     
    #13     Oct 15, 2017
  4. toc

    toc

    A nuclear war is soon coming to CNN.

    India fighting with Pakistan and limited/tactical to major scale nuclear escalation taking place.

    Be prepared for this in 2018. If China gets involved then chances of WWIII become real.
     
    #14     Oct 15, 2017
  5. Chris Mac

    Chris Mac

    If ifs and buts were candies and nuts...
    The only certainty :
    as always, markets will react before war / recession and rebound before the end

    CM
     
    #15     Oct 16, 2017
  6. Simples

    Simples

    For the markets there's nothing to prepare. In the event of all-out nuclear war and the savageness that was WWI and WWII, it's just "Game Over", for most human beings, at least the lucky ones. The idea of surviving in shelters was abandoned in the 50-60's when hydrogen bombs became reality. Nuclear triad ensures MAD, any escalation a self-destructive path to irrelevance. As a species, we can easily destroy meaningful survival, even in the best bomb shelters. The challenge now is in preventing our own destruction of environment, stopping genocide and our own demise as a species.
    The basic need for survival will entice global cooperation, abundance and prosperity on unprecedented scale.
     
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2017
    #16     Oct 16, 2017
  7. qxr1011

    qxr1011

    "immaculate conception" my a@@

    your analysis sucks

    because TA is not about predicting what's coming it's about determining what is happening now
     
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2017
    #17     Oct 16, 2017
    digitalnomad and speedo like this.
  8. Chris Mac

    Chris Mac

    IMO, true and false.
    Of course, TA helps to show trends, supports and resistances.
    But TA helps too for elaborating scenarios and predicting "credible" targets.
    Why? Because history repeats.
    For example, DJ Transport today, bear scenario and assuming we will face a correction close to July and February '17.

    upload_2017-10-16_17-23-11.png

    If you are short Transport, a logical target would be around 9300.
    Of course, maybe 9200 or 9400 would be a better target ("a posteriori").
    Just an example.

    CM
     
    #18     Oct 16, 2017
  9. qxr1011

    qxr1011


    imho u confusing TA with the trading method (that using it)

    TA does not have targets (the trader's method may have them), it has support and resistance

    TA does not have the way of determining which support or resistance is at play, only the method has to determine that

    and every determination by the method is only in the "now"

    that "now" is the scale of the chart(s) [5min, 15min, 1 hour] that the trader uses
     
    #19     Oct 16, 2017
  10. qxr1011

    qxr1011

    the only "future" that trader must accept (but unfortunately not to predict) is of the length of the scale of his "now"

    so if the decision is made on 5min chart the trader may have to wait the outcome 5min (some call it predicting:) )
     
    #20     Oct 16, 2017