IT Term

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by nwbprop, Mar 13, 2004.

  1. Thks db... I agree strongly with your statement on this page:

    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=29005&perpage=1&pagenumber=165

    about not thinking about things simply in terms of lines and angles -- but to delve into
    what the story is behind those lines and angles. (To me) doing this is much much
    much harder than it sounds -- but I believe this type of thought process is critical for
    any approach.

    JT
     
    #51     Mar 25, 2004
  2. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    You may want to look at the two posts following that one. It really shouldn't be all that hard, at least if you're a worker.
     
    #52     Mar 25, 2004
  3. Here is the current IT. This IT has been about 8 days long. I anticipate a BO up and a start of a new IT long that coincides with a Failure to traverse the LT short channel.
     
    • it.jpg
      File size:
      91.5 KB
      Views:
      64
    #53     Mar 26, 2004
  4. db -

    I've had a little time to think about your stairstep trend concept --
    I plan on reading your whole thread this weekend... but for
    starters:

    Your concept fits in nicely with my current concept of trend
    channels... to me one of the strongest concepts is how *price*
    provides support for the test after the BO and a platform
    for the next rise in the staircase. A violation of this support is
    a possible warning sign -- simple but good good stuff.

    further...

    For me -- when the 'test' portion of the stairstep pushes the
    'classic' TL to the right... it's a sign of reduced pace (by virtue
    of the fact that it just consumed more time to decide to
    hold) and possible weakness. (in my current world this is a
    "new pt 3").

    After I read your thread I'll post there... posting here now
    because this might be redundant.

    Thanks

    JT
     
    #54     Mar 26, 2004
  5. nwb - my lines are really close to what you are showing.

    Help me out here -- I think you are saying that the first IT
    was the traversal of the LT channel... roughly 3/8 - 3/16.

    I believe you are saying the 2nd IT has been the basically
    sideways movement since 3/16 (the last 8 days).

    bear with me -- I think we have the same concept -- but I think
    it's just a matter of semantics.

    Why not say --

    IT1 - strong traversal to the left side.
    IT2 - first pt3.
    IT3 - 2nd traversal with stalling at end.
    IT4 - (potentially) new pt3.

    In db's parlance we're seeing a test of the lows from IT1.

    The new pt3 changes the *pace* of the LT (but also carries
    the threat of reversal).

    Anyway - I think you are just abstracting IT2 - IT4 (as I have
    them) into one IT.

    JT
     
    #55     Mar 26, 2004
  6. I agree with nwb -- new pt3 in the works. The market might
    want to go up against the LT right side TL a 2nd time before
    it makes an attempt at traversal... we'll know Mon AM.

    personally...

    I wasn't surprised to see prices go gunning for the left side
    TL of the IT up channel... when things turned around 12:00
    I knew we we're potentially going up against a new LT pt3.

    The trouble for me today was around 14:30. I was definitely
    not going to go for the fake... we did have a vol BO but my
    instinct said it was a sucker play. (After all the talk about not
    following the trend yesterday - this took some guts)

    Don't get me wrong... a long was making $ while I was sitting
    and waiting... I thought that the longs breaking the overhead
    R was low probability.

    I had been watching intently for a down break on the 1min and
    the 5min. When the overhead R failed to hold and prices
    continued to march upwards I simply got discouraged and a bit
    fed up and I took a break at exactly the wrong time.

    any advice out there on false BO's?

    good weekend to everyone.

    JT
     
    #56     Mar 26, 2004