https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2018JD029601 A New 200‐Year Spatial Reconstruction of West Antarctic Surface Mass Balance High‐spatial resolution surface mass balance (SMB) over the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) spanning 1800–2010 is reconstructed by means of ice core records combined with the outputs of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts “Interim” reanalysis (ERA‐Interim) and the latest polar version of the Regional Atmospheric Climate Model (RACMO2.3p2). The reconstruction reveals a significant negative trend (−1.9 ± 2.2 Gt/year·per decade) in the SMB over the entire WAIS during the nineteenth century, but a statistically significant positive trend of 5.4 ± 2.9 Gt/year·per decade between 1900 and 2010, in contrast to insignificant WAIS SMB changes during the twentieth century reported earlier.
https://news.mit.edu/2019/antarctic-ice-cliffs-not-contribute-sea-level-rise-1021 Antarctic ice cliffs may not contribute to sea-level rise as much as predicted Study finds even the tallest ice cliffs should support their own weight rather than collapsing catastrophically. In a paper published today in Geophysical Research Letters, the team reports that in order for a 90-meter ice cliff to collapse entirely, the ice shelves supporting the cliff would have to break apart extremely quickly, within a matter of hours — a rate of ice loss that has not been observed in the modern record. “Ice shelves are about a kilometer thick, and some are the size of Texas,” says MIT graduate student Fiona Clerc. “To get into catastrophic failures of really tall ice cliffs, you would have to remove these ice shelves within hours, which seems unlikely no matter what the climate-change scenario.”
Air borne carcinogens, like CO2, don't stink like human shit. These cons will only believe things they don't see when presented by an ancient book in the form of fairy tales.
No a single person on Earth denies this. The AGW hypothesis, of course, is not that. It’s a fairy tale.
Maybe you should just hold your breath until you drop dead? You would be doing your AGW masters a big favor.
You were right with the first statement, it is in fact a hypothesis. One you disagree with and are thus not interested (or qualified) in testing.