Oh yeah Roy Spencer. What the fuck is wrong with you? Have you gotten the same brain eating amoeba that WTD2 has had since he was hatched? No satellite data is NOT the best data. That comes from the thousands of actual thermometers on the ground Why are you lying about this?
Roy Spencer is the US Team leader for NASA. Fraudcurrents manifests a complete lack of honesty. Attack the messenger on every thread and now almost every post. Ad homs instead of addressing the science or in his case the lack thereof. Roy Warren Spencer (born December 20, 1955)[1] is a meteorologist,[2] a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, and the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) on NASA's Aqua satellite.[3][4] He has served as senior scientist for climate studies at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.[3][4] He is known for his satellite-based temperature monitoring work, for which he was awarded the American Meteorological Society's Special Award.[4]
OK... let's use the unadjusted raw data from thousands of thermometers on the ground. Oh wait... this would show the world is not warming. Alarmists won't have it.
Spencer is a fool a crank and an industry tool that every real cimate scientist which he is not laughs at. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Roy_Spencer
Pallin' around with cranks and shills Spencer is affiliated with a number of astroturf and Christian fundamentalist organizations. He is a member of the George C. Marshall Institute, which was founded by expert for hire Frederick Seitz and is a think tank and front group for various corporate interests including oil companies. He also makes the rounds at the Heartland Institute's denialist conferences.[20] The fundamentalist organizations he has worked with include the Cornwall Alliance and the Interfaith Stewardship Alliance (ISA), which reorganized into the Cornwall Alliance in 2006. The organization promotes "Bible-based environmental stewardship," which translates to "a bunch of cranks denying science." He helped the ISA author their "Call to Truth," a denialist manifesto for evangelicals.[21][22] As is common amongst cranks, Spencer flaunts his credentials at every turn. His website is called www.drroyspencer.com and is entitled "Roy Spencer, Ph.D." Contrast this with the scientists at realclimate.org, who go by names like "Gavin" and "Mike". He has noticeably upped his crankiness levels in recent years, claiming that he has turned mostly to publishing books and articles in the popular press because his work has been kept out of the peer reviewed literature by the evil warmists. A rather egregious instance was his smear on Andrew Dessler (a climatologist who published work on clouds contrary to Spencer's claims) in which Spencer claimed that the shadowy cabal at the IPCC had pushed through Dessler's paper to hype global warming at the Cancun conference in 2010.[14] In 2011, he managed to get a paper pushing the PDO/ENSO line into the geography-oriented journal Remote Sensing. The reaction from other scientists? Same ol', same ol' Spencer.[15] Predictably, he immediately cried persecution.[16] Somewhat less predictably, the editor of the journal resigned about a month after the paper's publication.[17][18]
https://ktla.com/2019/02/04/sierra-blizzard-drops-so-much-snow-that-some-ski-resorts-close/ Sierra Blizzard Drops so Much Snow That Some Ski Resorts Close
The fact that some Christian pastors an some Catholic priests talk about being good stewards for future generations is something a real environmentalist would encourage. The pope and many mainline protestant denominations were in favor of staying in the Paris accords. Believing the bible teaches us to be stewards for future generations... in no way makes someone a believer or disbeliever in your crank science... its about 50/50. There is no science of man made co2 causing warming yet 50 percent of White evangelicals believe in global warming according to the washington post. In other words you just made shit up.
He has noticeably upped his crankiness levels in recent years, claiming that he has turned mostly to publishing books and articles in the popular press because his work has been kept out of the peer reviewed literature by the evil warmists. A rather egregious instance was his smear on Andrew Dessler (a climatologist who published work on clouds contrary to Spencer's claims) in which Spencer claimed that the shadowy cabal at the IPCC had pushed through Dessler's paper to hype global warming at the Cancun conference in 2010.[14] In 2011, he managed to get a paper pushing the PDO/ENSO line into the geography-oriented journal Remote Sensing. The reaction from other scientists? Same ol', same ol' Spencer.[15] Predictably, he immediately cried persecution.[16] Somewhat less predictably, the editor of the journal resigned about a month after the paper's publication.[17][1 Odd that both you and piehole think this fool is worthy of quoting. But it's typical of you.