its funny how fraudcurrents finds charts that have nothing almost nothing to do with the discussion. He posts a yearly chart when we are looking at a cool of which began from the el nino peak about 2 years ago. His yearly charts would not be granular enough to see anything since 2016 would be a yearly high point. we are talking about a rapid cooling over the last 2 years since the end of the el nino in 2016. so you would think you would want to post a monthly data chart to take a look at what is happening. And I created gistemp using their data to make sure the charts are similar and they are. We have been cooling quickly since the el nino. Only trolls would deny the facts and the data.
How many times do I have to tell you that satellite based lower atmosphere temp reading are not surface temps and are not as accurate as the thousands of land based actual thermometers. Get back to us with a two year surface temp chart of the world. Not that two years means anything.
Are you fucking serious piehole? WTF is wrong with you? Are you joking? Are you really a think tank operative? Are you really this stupid? Those are US land temps only. US, not the world. Look, if you are not going to educate yourself on this subject just STFU. This shit makes me lose all respect for you. Remember, AGW WILL certainly cause death and destruction. Do you want to contribute to that?
Yeah sorry, it's not Breitbart. Where you get all your (meaning none) science. Have you even looked at an unbiased source for the science of AGW? Just how tribal are you? And that chart is the fact, showing that your worries about the adjustment were based on ignorance. Now you know better. Not that you will show it in any way.
you lying fraud, fraudcurrents. I told you that the gistemp charts shows a similar drop off. therefore if you knew what gistemp was you would know I told you the surface temps also show the drop off. next is a side point... 2. the thermometer data is not necessarily more accurate than satellite data. the satellite data has been adjusted to correct for the errors in orbital changes and other imperfections where as the thermometer records seem to double down on their problems by eliminating stations which were probably valid.
It's funny how you make nothing sound like something important. Good defense lawyer stuff. Well done. But you are not allowed your own facts. Fact is that satellite temps are not surface temps and not as accurate. You really should know this by now. Unless..............lol
Talked to a physicist a few years ago who is now teaching at Unviversity of Texas. He said that during solar cycle minimums, the Earth receives more comic rays that result in increased cloud formation. This in turn reflects more solar energy into space and has a cooling effect on Earth until the sun completes it's low activity cycle. He said that it is ominous that the Earth has not cooled more than it has and that this implies when we into the next solar maximum, we will see a major ramp up in temperatures. Let's call the next solar maximum the BBQ event. I'll bring chips and drinks. Any thoughts on what would be an appropiate main course?
Well that's interesting. Are you telling us that the surface temperature moves opposite to the temperature in the lower atmosphere.
Yes, in the past solar input variations, whether from the variation of solar output or from orbital changes (Malankovitch Cycles) caused the temp changes. Today, the large increase in GHGs is much much larger in effect than those causes.
No you are saying that, which is wrong. And I guess that you do want to contribute to death and destruction.