ISLD & ETF's

Discussion in 'ETFs' started by ssternlight, Nov 14, 2002.

  1. This was news to me -- others may have posted it already. I guess ISLD really is caving...

    Sucks.


    ----------------------------------------


    Instinet CEO Ed Nicoll Provides Update on Island Integration and ETF Strategy
    Instinet and Island should be able to integrate their ECN businesses, and adopt a single matching engine, within one year. That's the latest news coming from Ed Nicoll, Instinet's newly-appointed chief executive officer.
    Nicoll -- the former Island chairman who took the reigns as Instinet's CEO after Instinet and Island finalized their merger on Sept. 20 -- says that executives from Instinet and Island are currently working with consultants to map out their integration strategy. "Both teams are working toward an integration path which we hope will result in a single matching engine and single ECN within a six to 12 month timeframe," he explains.

    In the past, sources close to Instinet and Island have said that it is extremely likely that Island's matching engine will form the core of the ECNs' integrated-trading platform, but Nicoll says that the unified system will probably be comprised of technology components from both Island and Instinet.

    While an integrated system is still a ways off, Instinet has already built an electronic bridge between its platform and Island's matching engine, enabling customers of both ECNs to tap into a vast liquidity pool. "We are (ultimately) going to integrate the two ECNs into one (physical) liquidity pool. (But) we've (already) starting doing that virtually, by putting in place software and communications solutions which allow (our) two pools of liquidity to instantly interact with themselves," says Nicoll. "So when (customers go) into Instinet, they will get the benefit of interacting with all of the liquidity in the Island pool. And when customers come into Island, they will get the benefit of interacting with all of the liquidity in the Instinet pool."

    Separately, Instinet has also recently significantly altered its strategy for exchange-traded funds (ETFs) -- open-ended mutual funds that Island has had great success trading over the past two years. From October 2001 through September of this year, Island was, in fact, the largest market for trading of the QQQ -- the most popular ETF. Island had surpassed the American Stock Exchange, the home market for the QQQ and several other high-profile ETFs, while refusing to participate in the Intermarket Trading System -- a trading platform that electronically links together the Amex, New York Stock Exchange, Nasdaq Stock Market and six other regional equity exchanges.

    Island consistently maintained that the ITS' so-called trade-through rule -- which states that each ITS member cannot trade a stock at an inferior price if there is a better price available at another market -- would negatively impact its speed-driven business model. But roughly two weeks ago, Island agreed to trade the QQQ and the SPY, the two largest ETFs, via Nasdaq's Intermarket -- a market that will require Instinet/Island to obey the trade-through rule that they have previously so vehemently opposed.

    The rule states that any ITS participant must route an order to an away market if a market has a better price for a specific stock than its own quote. But Island has in the past argued that the rule could greatly inhibit the speed of its ETF executions, because the market on the receiving end of an ITS order has a maximum of 30 seconds to respond.

    By agreeing to obey the rules of the ITS, Instinet/Island will now be able to post its QQQ and SPY quotes in the National Consolidated Quote System -- a real-time market data platform that displays the best bids and offers for listed stocks to everyone participating in ITS. Up until Sept. 23 of this year, Island, in lieu of displaying its quotes in the NSCS, had posted its ETF prices on its order book -- a book that was accessible to Island subscribers, as well as anyone who logged into the ECN's web site.

    But on Sept. 23, facing a regulatory display mandate issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, Island decided to terminate the posting of its top five ETF contracts on its book. The commission's ruling stated that, by Sept. 23, any ECN that held more than five percent of the volume in an ETF for four of the last six months had to display its prices for those instruments in the NCQS. Island subsequently decided to eliminate the posting of its ETF quotes all together, rather than display on the NCQS, because it did not want to be subject to the ITS trade-through rule.

    Since it decided to go dark on Sept. 23, however, Island saw its market share in ETFs -- particularly the QQQ and the DIA -- decrease significantly. Consequently, says Nicoll, Instinet decided that it had to take a chance in participating in the ITS, because it needed a mechanism for making its ETF quotes transparent. "We have lost significant market share in the ETFs, at Island, since we stopped publishing our quotes. We are still, I believe, the largest market in the QQQs. But we freely admit that we have lost customers for whom a published quote is important, in terms of the way they interact in the marketplace," he says.

    The one positive thing that ITS has going for it, says Nicoll, is a recently instituted exemption to the trade-through rule. The so-called de minimis trade-through rule exemption enables firms to trade-through another market's price for a specific ETF, as long as the transaction is no more than three cents away from the best bid or offer displayed in the NCQS. The exemption, which is limited to the three largest ETF contracts, was created by the SEC and put into effect on Aug. 28. "We are trying to determine whether posting in the ITS, with that de minimis exception in mind, creates a better set of market dynamics than being outside of ITS but being unable to post our quote," says Nicoll.

    Basically, he says, the SEC's Sept. 23 ruling created a no-win situation for the Instinet/Island team, in terms of trading ETFs. "On one hand, we could not publish a quote and have a poorer marketplace as a result of that. On the other hand, we can publish our quote and participate in the ITS and have, in our view, a poorer marketplace as a result of that. So it's not an easy decision for us, " Nicoll explains.

    Currently, Nicoll is in the middle of a six-week global customer tour, during which he plans to meet with many of Instinet's largest clients. Throughout the tour, says Nicoll, he will not only explain the Instinet/Island integration schedule to clients, but also get customer feedback on the pros and cons of both companies.
     
  2. Wow, that's a total copout/compromise. The SEC bended to both nicoll and the AMEX. Freaky. I wonder if the .03 thing, if adopted, would give price improvement and take cash from arbs...

    You know, I bet nicoll is going to go everywhere in the US, and not talk to one person who is a real, live, trader.
     
  3. Do you guys know if there is an exchange that would try to fill my SPY order and if can't be filled at the NBBO would farm it out at the next level down to whatever exchange if a sell order or up is a buy order? I am trying to automate my trading system so I need to program a sell(buy)order which will get filled at market until the entire quantity is filled. My old system REDI has a proactive feature in NAZ stocks so I don't know if this is a software specific issue or an exchange issue. Thanks
     
  4. jwcrim

    jwcrim

    HOW DOES THE DE MINIMIS EXEMPTION IMPACT MY TRADING?
    As a result of the trade-through rule, the Island system will perform price checking at the time of order entry and afterwards to ensure compliance with the trade-through rule. Below is a description of these checks.


    Order entry - At the time of order entry, every order will be checked to ensure that it does not cross the market by more than three cents. If an order crosses the market by more than three cents it will be repriced to be exactly three cents above the offer (for bids) or below the bid (for offers).

    Example:

    The National Best Bid in QQQ is $25.00.
    Island Subscriber enters an order to sell at $24.96.
    The Island system will automatically reprice the order to $24.97.

    Post order entry - An order entered for display will not be impacted by the trade-through rule after it is accepted. A non-display order, however, may be cancelled from the Island book with the reason code of #DNT if the market moves through the order by greater than three-cents after the order is accepted.

    Example:

    The National Best Bid in QQQ is $25.00
    Island Subscriber enters a non-display order to sell at $24.97.
    The National Best Bid in QQQ becomes $25.01.
    The non-display order at $24.97 will be cancelled with the reason code #DNT.