I present you with the ultimate display of hypocrisy: Do not insult religions other than Christians: Apparently, it is totally fine to insult Christians:
Except you couldn't find a single mention of muslim in what you quoted. What you present is the ultimate incapability of comprehending what you read. Did you skip "skool" as a kid ?
So the bottom line is that you view a newspaper exercising its right of free speech in a western country as not good. According to you this means that anyone who is offended by material in a newspaper should certainly resort to violence - because in your world violently murdering people is the equivalent of printing material in a newspaper that offends someone. Your assertion is that both are equally not good. In this case - are you confirming all the offensive anti-Jewish and anti-Christian material in Muslim newpapers worldwide is not good? It also means that sending assassination teams to kill all the staff of papers world-wide that publish any offensive material is perfectly acceptable - because both activities are equally not good. Glad your position is clear that murder is equal to publishing material that may offend someone. Good to make it clear where you are coming from.
Israel do go assassinate people they don't like. Would you like to state you don't agree with that ? If a newspaper causes people to commit murder, then it's a bad newspaper. If we get rid of bad newspaper, then there will not be the resulting murder. Is your personal preference for the newspaper to continue to cause more murders ? My position is clearly that of getting rid of newspaper that causes murder.
Israel assassinated terrorists who killed people. Israel did not assassinate people who printed articles that were offensive to Jews. Can you understand the difference? "If a newspaper causes people to commit murder, then it's a bad newspaper. If we get rid of bad newspaper, then there will not be the resulting murder. Is your personal preference for the newspaper to continue to cause more murders ?" - This quote is particularly revealing of your mind set. This means that any liberal paper that offends a conservative is a bad newspaper. Any conservative paper that offends a liberal is a bad newspaper. Any newspaper that publishes a recipe with the wrong amount of an ingredient and offends a chef is a bad paper. Every paper prints material that offends someone. In your world all newspapers are bad and need to be shut down, and printing an article that offends someone is equivalent of murder.
Do you think that the people live in places like Brazil, Mexico, China, etc. are white? http://www.pewforum.org/2011/12/19/table-christian-population-in-numbers-by-country/
I apologize. I corrected the post. Are you happy now? However, the above post seems to contradict your quote below.
If just by labelling someone as a terrorist is justification enough for assassination, then has it been proven that none of the assassinated persons were not news writers who got labelled as a terrorist ? Those are your ideas not mine. Any newspaper that causes murder is a bad paper. Most papers don't cause murder.
So you correct a post and expect my response to your original post to take into account of the correction in advance ? I appreciate you compliments of my powers. But I am just an ordinery person with no special magical powers.