Ah...you did not read my original post correctly. The policeman was not armed. http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/07/unarmed-paris-police-retreated-from-terrorist-gunmen-video/
The CBS article which "daily caller" uses as a source appears not to mention anything about whether the policeman was armed or not. If you can find any such mention in the source material, please quote it.
CBS News relayed reports from Britain’s Telegraph newspaper that the first two officers to arrive “were apparently unarmed” and “fled after seeing gunmen armed with automatic weapons and possibly a grenade launcher.” The UK’s Independent reported that “three policemen arrived on bikes but had to leave because [the attackers] were armed.” A policeman who had been assigned the position of bodyguard to Charlie Hebdo editor, Stephane Charbonnier, was killed, and one policeman on a mountain bike was killed, as well. Another dbnarrative falls apart.
Arrived on bicycles, one presumes. And ringing the bell as they arrived. Ring ring! Run away now bad guys!
Starting over, we don't know that he wasn't armed. Those who were not armed were not shot; they fled.
See? Obfuscate. Again. We know he wasn't armed. Only DB doesn't. As for "those who were not armed were not shot", I guess there were at least 12 armed people at the comic paper.
Starting over again, we don't know that he wasn't armed. Those policemen who were not armed were not shot; they fled. And again, if someone can quote a reputable source that the "executed" policeman was not armed, please provide it.