Yes but the point is to narrow the scope of potential perpetrators and you are trying to expand it. You might as well say that all suicide bombers are mammals but while it's accurate - it's meaningless. They are male muslim mammals.
very true. mammals. the genus of suicide (esp lemmings). we merely have to kill off all the mammals. problem solved. generalization is a great way to understand a problem. note: generalizing a species or gender is as useful as generalizing a religion of billions.
No, they think they are in jihad and they know there are no military targets in malls and restaurants. And if you think you're clever - think again, you are using the logic of a 10 year old. And that the Japanese used kamikaze 65 years ago does not justify the actions of modern day muslim terrorists, kamikaze tactics against military targets were wrong then and muslim terrorism against innocent civilians is 100 times more wrong today.
See how silly you are - we absolutely don't have to. We can limit it to muslim male mammals only and achieve exactly the same result - that's the point of narrowing the scope.
hah.. ya.. they are not at war.. they are in jihad (see definition of jihad). true there is sectarian violence going on. it seems pointless to talk about the innocent civilians dying from suicide bombers without discussing the vast majority of civilian deaths caused by US military actions. the same US military actions which is mostly supported by christian fundamentalists, and is rationalized using christian ideology. christianity is obviously the religion of killing innocents. wait. you are right. generalization is wrong. lets focus that statement a little bit and ignore adults. christianity is obviously the religion of killing innocent children. ya. that has a better ring to it so if we want to save a maximum number of innocent children. we just have to cull all christians (adults). isn't generalization fun? and no. i dont think im clever. i think all my arguments are as stupid as the main point in this thread. thanks for catching on without me spelling it out for you. and no. we cant limit the cull to male muslims mammals. please note also please pay special attention to the fact that a secular marxist-leninist group drawn from hindu families != islamic. all your points are void. thanks for playing.
..vast majority of civilian deaths caused by US military actions. Civilian deaths caused by US military actions are not intentional and it's quite sad that the difference between these actions and deliberate killings of innocent civilians by muslim terrorists escapes you. i dont think im clever. Good, you should not. i think all my arguments are as stupid as the main point in this thread. No, your arguments are significantly dumber. Let me help you with this - an overwhelming majority of pedophiles are white males, not mammals, an overwhelming majority of the Nazis during WWII were germans, not mammals, an overwhelming majority of terrorists and suicide bombers are male muslims, not mammals.
I mentioned this in another post. There is a parallel between the two, and if you read into the history of the Japanese at that time, you will see that from an early age, the Japanese children were indoctrinated the same way that Muslim children today are. All male Japanese children were sent to military schools where they were taught that dying for the emperor brought the greatest honor to their family. There was nothing higher. Sound familiar. Here is the post if you want to take a look: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1201852#post1201852
almost nothing to do with suicide, but still an interesting read, http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1170359764921&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
As a military tactic aimed at causing material damage in war, suicide attacks became widely known during the Second World War in the Pacific as Allied ships were attacked by Japanese kamikaze pilots who caused maximum damage by flying their explosive-laden aircraft into military targets, not focused on civilian targets. Since the 1980s, the apparent low cost and high lethality of the tactic perhaps explains its increased use by resistance movements, including guerrilla and insurgent groups -- termed "terrorist groups" against the targeted governments. Most notably, the tactic has been used in the Middle East and Sri Lanka. The Tamil Tigers have been waging an insurgent campaign against the Sri Lankan government. Neither the Japanese nor the Tamil Tigers are Muslims.