So the kid can chain migrate his terrorist father, terrorist mother, and other terrorist relatives to the U.S. eventually. No thanks. Children of terrorists who declared war on the United States should never be eligible to come to our country. Both parents of this kid were members of a terrorist organization that harmed many Americans. The kid is not entitled in any manner to be in the United States.
Probably should be allowed back, if...we could stone her, make her keep her face covered, beat her with sticks, not allow her to drive, marry her daughter off at 11, assume she is "property," force her to only clean and cook, etc, etc...
I don't know the status of the grandparents either. If they are still under green card, I would move them out too, especially if the woman was involved in isis-contact while in their household. ie. harboring an enemy of the united states. If they are citizens now then that is not do-able unless they lied on their application in some place. They are free also to go to another country and join the mother and the child.
I would not go so far to automatically remove those in the United States legally under green cards. However I would eliminate all ability for them to do any further chain migrations of others to the U.S. -- while making it very clear they are being closely watched for terrorist connections. And if clear terrorist connections are discovered then they will be deported. In many ways situations like these are a mess for the relatives in the U.S. who do not support terrorism. They should be the most vocal in denouncing their family members who support ISIS -- not whining that little junior terrorist dipshiat is not allowed back.
I think all those "psychologists" who think Trump is delusional would believe that would be "therapy" for that bitch.
It is moot now but if they had any knowledge of her isis contacts while she in their household I would be finding a way to move them out if they were still under green card. That is a privilege not a right and harboring an enemy of the united states would be evidence of the requirement to maintain moral turpitude under the state. Depends on what the facts were. It is moot because I guess they are naturalized citizens now. I guess it is complicated too. The isis woman apparently was born in U.S. but Pompeo and company allege that her father was a diplomat and the relevant immigration treaty or statute apparently specifies that diplomats are not subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S within the language of the Constitution. Complicated. She will get a bunch of lefty lawyers and go round and round. Fine, start with keeping her and her child out. No doubt her lawyers will be paid by the u.s. government.
Entitled = his grandparents sponsoring him coming home. Why is all your hate for her being dumped on an 18 month old child? Are you that much of a cold person? If the grandparents petitioned to bring the child would you be against it?