Is World heading towards World War III?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by talknet, Jan 10, 2009.

Is World heading towards World War III?

  1. Yes

    34 vote(s)
    52.3%
  2. No

    31 vote(s)
    47.7%
  1. joemiami

    joemiami Guest

    Another stupid worthless thread........................
     
    #11     Jan 10, 2009
  2. nidarian

    nidarian

    Agreed. Idiot that wrote this needs to wake up.
     
    #12     Jan 10, 2009
  3. All rubbish.
     
    #13     Jan 10, 2009
  4. Every time there is any kind of conflict in the world, idiots like you proclaim that there is a new world war in the offing.
     
    #14     Jan 10, 2009
  5. talknet

    talknet

    I think some people are scared of World Wars. Be brave and face the real world. World War is the ultimate fate of mankind. All the weapons that have been developed will fire one day.

    Humans made the "biggest mistake" by developing "massive weapons"

    "Mother Earth" does not have the resources to support 7 billion people. So the "global financial crisis" was inevitable (had to happen).
     
    #15     Jan 10, 2009
  6. LOL. You have absolutely no clue.
     
    #16     Jan 10, 2009
  7. zdreg

    zdreg

    correct. the goal is to weaken but not eliminate Israel. Israel's existence is useful to most arab government because it diverts the attention of the arab masses from their corrupt governments and from their continued economic backwardness and from the lack of democracy in their countries.
     
    #17     Jan 10, 2009
  8. speres

    speres

    After WW2 and Hilter do you really think Germany would be heavily involved in starting WW3?

    complete and utter nonsense
     
    #18     Jan 10, 2009
  9. "There will be wars and rumors of wars" means, in the last days of each one's experience of time, awakening minds will notice that there have always been wars in the world, and always will be.

    The next war will be fought like in the first Indiana Jones movie where somewhere in the middle east, an enemy approaches Jones with much brandishing of sword and rattling of swordmanship. But the weary Jones was not interested in conventional warfare as dictated by that culture, and so just pulled his pistol and shot the would-be assailant dead on the spot.

    The U.S. is far too overextended to engage in a conventional war against the next big enemy. So when the enemy rattles dirty nukes in major cities, the U.S. will brandish it's own nukes and shoot whomever it believes is the enemy...or says is the enemy.

    The world will believe the enemy is dead, and, breathing a sigh of relief, will reinvest in corporations. The world economy will rebound and head up into one of the greatest bull markets ever through 2045.

    But because the problem will not really be solved, conventional warheads will get bigger and bigger.

    Christ!
     
    #19     Jan 10, 2009
  10. Even if India and Pakistan start a war (even nuclear) it will be a local war, neither country has strong, close and loyal enough allies to get involved. The West did nothing when Russia invaded Georgia, if Russia invades Ukraine the outcome will be the same - a minor local conflict, certainly not WWIII. The Israeli Hamas war is actually tearing the islamic world apart along Iran/Syria/Hezbollah/Hamas vs Egypt/Saudi/Kuwait lines.


    The only realistic possibility of WWIII is Iran getting nukes and nuking Israel. I am not saying it will happen but that's the only plausible scenario that may lead to WWIII.
     
    #20     Jan 10, 2009