Is trading Gambling or not .."What say You" Vote here.

Discussion in 'Psychology' started by ElectricSavant, Apr 10, 2005.

Is Trading Gambling or not

This poll will close on Jan 12, 2060 at 11:25 AM.
  1. Gambling

    460 vote(s)
    35.0%
  2. Not Gambling

    854 vote(s)
    65.0%
  1. Do you need to control risk when "Not Gambling"?

    Have you voted in the poll here?

    ES

     
    #961     Mar 23, 2011
  2. I think this whole thread really comes down to the definition of gambling.

    everyone's definition/perception of the word will be different.

    I vote that it is gambling because there are always unforeseen risks. Order execution, slippage, broker errors, platform errors , broker going belly up.

    Edit I guess limit orders would take care of order execution, but platform errors can happen.
     
    #962     Mar 23, 2011
  3. so the only way trading can be anything other than "Not Gambling" is because of things beyond ones control?

    ES


     
    #963     Mar 23, 2011
  4. Gambling is the wagering of money or something of material value (referred to as "the stakes") on an event with an uncertain outcome...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambling

    So IMO anything with an uncertain outcome is gambling. Platform errors , broker errors ect. create uncertain outcomes
     
    #964     Mar 23, 2011
  5. Also, if im counting cards in a casino, yeah the odds are in my favor and some may not think it is gambling . I say it is gambling because you could be down a few grand when you get caught/kicked out. Uncertain outcomes come in many shapes and sizes.
     
    #965     Mar 23, 2011
  6. So "not gambling" is merely a mental state of mind?

    For those of you that have not voted...Please vote now...what say you?

    ES
     
    #966     Mar 23, 2011
  7. achilles28

    achilles28

    Profitable trading is like counting cards in a game of black jack.

    Which is no more gambling than operating a casino - the odds are decidedly in your favor.

    /thread.
     
    #967     Mar 23, 2011
  8. So only profitable traders are "not gambling"?

    ES


     
    #968     Mar 23, 2011
  9. achilles28

    achilles28

    Over the long-term, yes.

    In the short-term, beginners luck or one-way markets account for traders who will eventually lose...
     
    #969     Mar 23, 2011
  10. Still stirring it up ES :)

    My take on this varies a little and isn't simple - because trading and gambling are closely linked by some definitions but the differences between professional trading and amateur gambling are important.

    Same:
    In both cases you put up money that you will lose in return for the opportunity to keep your stake and win more.
    In both cases its about probabilities and when you begin a trade/gamble you don't know for sure whether you will win or lose
    In both cases the game can be simple or complex after entry with simple exits or complex trade management/betting.

    Different:
    One is done for a thrill; the other to take profit over time.
    One is addictive and often fun; the other less so and more likely to be satisfying than thrilling
    One is based on impulse, emotion, and intuition; the other on discipline and often (at least to a large extent) is rule based.


    I do accept that the professional trader and professional gambler are extremely similar people. IMO the trader can get an easier and bigger edge but maybe it isn't that easy.

    The other difference is that trading can make a contribution to business/society because it facilitates price discovery and can provide liquidity required for the markets to be effective.
     
    #970     Mar 23, 2011