Is trading Gambling or not .."What say You" Vote here.

Discussion in 'Psychology' started by ElectricSavant, Apr 10, 2005.

Is Trading Gambling or not

This poll will close on Jan 12, 2060 at 11:25 AM.
  1. Gambling

    460 vote(s)
    35.0%
  2. Not Gambling

    854 vote(s)
    65.0%
  1. Rocko1

    Rocko1

    Hey we have an almost Fibonacci ratio of gamblers and the non-gamblers, WOOOOOOOO....
     
    #651     Dec 9, 2006
  2. Rocko1

    Rocko1

    Hey we have an almost Fibonacci ratio of gamblers and the non-gamblers, woooo...
     
    #652     Dec 9, 2006
  3. And we have one extra post :)

     
    #653     Dec 9, 2006
  4. What do you do when you bet on a horse race?

    You invest in a stock after considerable study and hope it's price will rise. If your horse/stock wins then you collect your winnings, if it loses, then you've done your dough... IBM or Secretariat, no difference
     
    #654     Dec 10, 2006
  5. I do not want to get into this much..ok? I was a professional Gambler full-time for several years, with what was known as the travgallop in Sweden pre 1995 . I was connected to the track via postnet....I handicapped what was called the V5..

    I had two computer programs that did the technicals and printed the (parlay) tickets...I viewed the horses by video...sometimes the evening bets were 3k up to more thousands than I care to remember. It took sometimes 1/2 hr to scan my tickets...(I even had a Stevie Cohen red phone and a network of fellow gamblers would call for my numbers)

    It is nothing like trading and I challenge you to compare "living horses" to trading...

    I will also tell you something else...I had videos of Jockeys side by side from different races intentionally performing. I will not say more.

    Michael B.


     
    #655     Dec 10, 2006
  6. I developed a computer trifecta program that required over 500 different combinations of horses to be read out over the phone each frickin race, got 30k up before I got sick of spending all my time on the phone... trust me... an edge is an edge is an edge... identical to trading in nature... and both are always gambling... unless of course you can produce a system that is 100% correct 100% of the time savvy?
     
    #656     Dec 10, 2006
  7. Dumb poll. Why argue semantics all day long? Worthless.

    Is going to your office job gambling? If you dont perform, youre fired, you risk losing a paycheck.

    Personally, I define gambling as risking anything without having a positive expectancy.

    So trading is not gambling. Going to work at the office is not gambling.

    Playing roulette at the casino, *is* gambling.

    Using my definition, gambling = stupid thing idiots do
     
    #657     Dec 10, 2006
  8. 777

    777

    It Depends on how you define gambling.

    There are Professional Gamblers who earn money. They play with a Positive Expectation and manage their risk.

    The IRS allows these people to file as Professional Gamblers.

    Professional Gambling and Professional Trading both center around "Expected Value" and "Variance".
     
    #658     Dec 10, 2006
  9. 28,

    We have more in common than i care to think about :)


     
    #659     Dec 10, 2006
  10. 7's,

    did you vote sir?

    Thank you in advance...

    I define gambling as a consequence or a benefit expected in taking a foolish and/or impulsive chance.

    I define "not gambling" as having the edge as a Casino has. The act of gambling or gambling in progress can be "not trading".


     
    #660     Dec 10, 2006