Is trading Gambling or not .."What say You" Vote here.

Discussion in 'Psychology' started by ElectricSavant, Apr 10, 2005.

Is Trading Gambling or not

This poll will close on Jan 12, 2060 at 11:25 AM.
  1. Gambling

    460 vote(s)
    35.0%
  2. Not Gambling

    854 vote(s)
    65.0%
  1. We are the Champions We are the champions...lalalala

    Michael B.

    P.S. Without bragging, do you folks think that this illustration of 2 systems whether you believe they are gambling or not are the only ones, in support of the "Non Gambling" method of trading?

    You can still change your vote!

    The vote appears to be nearing 2:1 for NOT gambling again, after a larger sample size

     
    #341     Apr 28, 2005
  2. This was one of the kinder things said to me publically and you would not believe the PM's...

    Electric, I must thank you for putting up this great thread.

    May you prosper from such fantastic ideas and to be so generous in sharing them.



    Thank you guys...Give a little..it all comes back one way or another. It has been worth it for me, I expect nothing. Good Trading to you cooldude and others. Blessed be the peacemakers...

    Michael B.
     
    #342     Apr 28, 2005
  3. Quiz:

    Lets assume for a minute that Human Nature is to take 5 steps forward and three steps back...How could you apply this to trading?

    Michael B.
     
    #343     Apr 28, 2005
  4. How can trading = gambling? NO WAY!
    __________________
    I am a dumb trader. Good, you will inherit pips.
     
    #344     Apr 28, 2005
  5. Have you voted?
     
    #345     May 4, 2005
  6. guy2

    guy2

    In the article that I mentioned earlier there is mention of 2 types of trader:
    1. Random Trader
    2. Signaled Trader

    The Random Trader is gambling (i.e. odds are not in his/her favor) and the Signaled Trader is not gambling (or is "the house") because the odds favor the Signaled Trader over the long run.
     
    #346     May 5, 2005
  7. Did you vote?
     
    #347     Jun 4, 2005
  8. guy2

    guy2

    What do you conclude from the voting results so far (apart from the obvious raw results)?
     
    #348     Jun 4, 2005
  9. That 66.27% know what they are talking about.
     
    #349     Jun 4, 2005
  10. Well,

    Good question. This is an anonymous Forum, perhaps the sample size includes multiple alias's. Also the skill level and experience of the trader has not been qualified...oh yeah you said besides the "raw results"...sorry...

    I would say that 2:1 for Not Gambling would not be strong enough for me to consider it as a consensus...

    For me personally, turning the "Gambling Meter" down is a part of the way I trade.

    Being that trading is a losing proposition from the "get go", if you can find a way to turn that around ever-so-slightly where time would be on your side, then I would say that Trading DOES NOT NEED TO BE gambling...read carefully.

    Michael B.


    P.S. To demonstrate this see:

    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=48230
     
    #350     Jun 4, 2005