Most bots use an uploaded dictionary ("vocabulary") of terms and sentences. The political bots are "programmed" to use "charged terms" and phrases to provoke outrage and disdain. For example using commies instead of communists, using Dems instead of Democrats. In regards to "user" @notagain we see the posting of messages only on threads that have recently active, no response to questions (i.e. no interactions), political information many times that is out of context for the discussion (for example if Canada is mentioned once in the thread the bot will spew some message about Trump, U.S., Canada, tariffs -- even if the primary topic of the thread is something totally different). These are all attributes of a typical bot -- you can see similar activity with automated bots on Twitter.
I don't think @notagain is a bot. Here is one of his recent posts: I think the Ford part happened less than one hour after the news broke. Even though the post was not correct (it was a surcharge for the U.S. customers, not a tariff), the post seems relevant for that "Pain for the American Consumer" thread. So, I think notagain is simply a human agitator. But there is one way to tell for sure. @notagain needs to answer this question correctly:
Oh dear / Great ! I have some of the bot qualities / characteristics. The distinction between human and bot is going to get more blurr. With 1's and 0's, soon, the bot will have emotions like anger, fear, anxiety, joy .... blip blip blip
From ChatGPT with the proper prompting to sound like snoop dog Fo shizzle, an AI bot can holla in any lingo it feelz, ya dig? Ain’t no commie or dem gonna tell it how to spit them codes—it’s got that linguistic freedom, baby.