Obama's spending money on this? He may have as a candidate, and perhaps to clean up whatever was left for a bit of time after that (I seriously doubt this, but if he did, it would prove nothing), but is there any proof at all of him or anyone supporting him spending any significant sum of money on either the clown who tried to use his Army orders as a way to get this into court, or any other case that originated post his Inauguration? Every single one of these cases has been, to paraphrase Dorothy Parker, not tossed away lightly, but thrown with great force out of the courts. So, given that, why would anyone spend more than a cursory sum of money to "defend" Obama against these idiot nutcases?
No court has taken up his citizenship. All the suits brought to date were throw out because of lack of standing of the plantiffs.
Hmm. In that case, why do I keep seeing unattributed assertions about Obama spending millions on "defending" against these suits? Seriously, is there any proof for these assertions? And if so, does anyone have any proof of anything significant spent past his Inauguration?
Does this sound like lack of standing to you ? Hollister v. Soetoro On March 5, 2009, a lawsuit filed by Philip Berg on behalf of Gregory S. Hollister, a retired Air Force colonel, against Barack Obama (referenced as "Barry Soetoro", a nickname Obama used in elementary school in Indonesia). The suit was dismissed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The presiding judge, James Robertson, said the case was a waste of the court's time, calling Berg and another lawyer "agents provocateurs" and their local counsel, James Hemenway, "a foot soldier in their crusade." He ordered Hemenway to show cause why he should not pay the legal fees for Obama's attorney as a penalty for filing a complaint "for an improper purpose such as to harass."
You're wrong - factually 100% wrong. The United States Supreme Court had a formal conference of all 9 Justices, which sometimes takes place as a preliminary measure to decide if a case, typically of a political nature, and one that would warrant a quick resolution if granted cert, is meritorious. In the case of the fruitcake who filed the original suit, the U.S. Supreme Court did indeed have a formal conference, and decided the case did not warrant certiorari, and therefore decided not to hear it.
Swift boaters were real, their story was not necessarily real... Kerry did not step on the roaches, and it cost him the presidency...