I have already posted the link to the CDC and KFF data by state in the U.S. many times. Similarly I have posted the U.K. health ministry data as well as data from counties in the EU. It is very easy to search and look up the factual data provided by countries.
And yet the title of the paper at your link is -- New paper out: Germany’s current COVID-19 crisis is mainly driven by the unvaccinated https://rocs.hu-berlin.de/news/role_of_vaccinated/
Let me try the large font thing maybe that will get the point across. MY ENTIRE POINT IS THAT THE PAPER IS DISINGENUOUS. IT USES MATHEMATICAL GOBBLEDEGOOK TO MAKE A CASE FOR LOCKING DOWN UNVACCINATED WHILE IGNORING THE FACT THAT THE VACCINES DON'T REALLY APPEAR TO WORK. IF THEY ACTUALLY WORKED, THEN THERE WOULD BE NO NEED TO WORRY. IN A NUTSHELL THIS MEANS THAT YOU ARE FAT AND QUITE POSSIBLY GAY.
Go read the rest of the paper including the conclusion. It carefully walks through the math and the equations including infection spread. You are merely referring to one study (of many listed in the appendix) in the introduction of a limited number of people over a 4 week period in Germany. There are many other studies listed in the appendix -- and this particular study itself uses a full data set for the country. Basically you are using the typical anti-vaxxer playbook by referencing one sentence of a study -- taken out of context of the complete study. The reality is that this particular study shows very clearly that Covid-19 crisis is driven by the unvaccinated. The paper is not at all disingenuous; it carefully outlines the math and facts. Covid vaccines are working very well. The vaccinated breakthrough rate in western nations is below 0.5% -- which is excellent in an environment where a disease is highly prevalent. Over 95% of Covid cases, hospitalizations and deaths are unvaccinated. As outlined in the paper the unvaccinated are primarily responsible for spreading Covid and are the cause for the pandemic being extended which is leading to the requirement for more lockdowns and restrictions. Effectively anti-vaxxers do not want to be responsible individuals and want to stay locked down forever.
Not an anti-vaxxer. I am anti-big government though. I glanced through the paper. What the paper does is build a model and then finds parameters that fit the predetermined conclusion. I thought traders should be wary of overfitting. So they develop a fancy mathematical model, find parameters that fit, and say yep, it's unvaxxed. Lock 'em down boys. Meanwhile they ignore the data in their own paper which shows that vaccinations are basically useless for the population that needs them the most. I cannot reference 0.5% or 95% because those are not in this paper and I have no idea how those numbers are derived. So arguing specifically about the paper, it vibes "smartest guys in the room". Build a model, make it indecipherable, find parameters that fit observations, boom done. At a minimum, this would need to be backed up by controlled experimentation but which path do you think the follow up will go? Let's see, most REAL papers always have follow up. Do they? Nope. That means their conclusion was already made and they are not interested in disqualifying the conclusion. Result: this gives the government exactly what they want. Create an open air prison for those who are basically anti-big government. See the trees, miss the forest.
Actual ways to disqualify their gobbledygook conclusion: 1. They acknowledge that it is a VERY short period of time 2. They also know that vaccine efficacy reduces which means that you're gonna be boosted 4 lyfe. #BoosterGang Putting only these together, these are NOT accounted for in their model and thus they cannot unequivocally conclude lock down unvaxxed. Including a time dependent vaccine efficacy factor would more than likely eliminate most if not all of their supposed contributions. But surprise, even though they knew about it, they didn't include it in their model. One has to wonder why.