I'm not triggered at all. I think you might need to re-examine the definition of "triggered" and then consider who is taking umbrage here. But if it makes you feel safer, I can leave you alone. I certainly don't want to upset you. I think its perfectly in a logical line of questioning. You make the claim that Rudy is wasting taxpayer dollars (which I agree with, by the way). But as usual, you ignore similar issues of the same on the other side of the aisle, trying to justify and avoid answering questions that you are boxed in on, which of course just makes you out to be even more hypocritical. If you just had honest dialogue, this might go a lot smoother for you. But, I understand why you don't.
We've been paying Trump properties for Trump (I'll be too busy to golf) golfing, so I'd assume we'll be paying for this, too.
1) Obama didn't golf nearly as much. 2) We didn't pay Obama owned properties. 3) Trump criticized Obama's frequency of golfing, so it's open season on the motherfucker.
1. Subjective as what is too much, easily definable as what is more. 2. Because Obama didn't own properties. If he had, we would have. 3. Have at him. He deserves every bit of it for making that a point.
Yeah, sure. If Obama had owned such businesses HE would have been the president to break the long history of presidents disentangling and divesting themselves before they take office, instead of that president actually being Trump. So it's Obama's fault, he only lacked the context, and Trump is merely getting even... for what Obama would have done. Makes perfect sense!
No, just that if Obama had properties, he would have used them in his Presidential business. That's all I was saying.