Is Newt A Viable Candidate?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by AAAintheBeltway, Nov 15, 2011.

  1. Ricter

    Ricter

    Not at all impossible, the candidate could be a supply-sider. Your team isn't thinking of fielding a supply-sider, is it?
     
    #91     Nov 17, 2011
  2. FDR.
     
    #92     Nov 17, 2011
  3. jem

    jem

    supply siders have proof that revenues went up within two years of reagan cutting taxes.

    Congress' out of control spending is the reason for the deficits. Tax cuts can and sometimes do lead to increased revenues. That can be seen in graphs posted on elitetrader.
     
    #93     Nov 17, 2011
  4. Lucrum

    Lucrum



    Read very slowly Rectum, No one is worse than Obama
     
    #94     Nov 17, 2011
  5. wow, as a true independent who is unhappy with much of what Obama has, and has not done, you guys make me shudder to think that I may want to vote on the same republican side. The childish odumbos and all the kindergarten crap is just not part of any team I want to be part of. You guys are doing the same thing as the republican debates, making Obama look good. I suggested Jeb Bush, but was rebutted with concerns about a Bush dynasty, probably rightfully so. Newt may be able to do it. Heaven help us.




    c
     
    #95     Nov 17, 2011
  6. I thought it would be obvious. Obama is a far left radical. He neither understands what made this country great nor honors it.

    Plus, he is a weak leader who commands zero respect. His administration is riddled with corruption, both political and financial.
     
    #96     Nov 17, 2011
  7. man do you ever think before you post? want to compare corruption in any republican administration with obamas?
     
    #97     Nov 17, 2011
  8. Ricter

    Ricter

    You've admitted previously that you think there are worse.

    Edit: by the way, you used the first insult, you lose.
     
    #98     Nov 17, 2011
  9. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Show me where I said any of the current GOP candidates are worse than Obama.
     
    #99     Nov 17, 2011
  10. Max E.

    Max E.

    Yes, I do.

    I have already given Obama the benefit of the doubt saying that had the republicans been in charge and been given a trillion dollar slush fund it would have more than likely ended up the same way, but the fact of the matter is that Obama and the dems were in control when the 1 trillion dollar slush fund was passed, and there is 1 story after another that has proven that this has been nothing more than a payout to campaign donors, and liberal groups.

    The problem isnt a problem that necessarily has to do with either party, it is a problem with giving government on either side ANY large amount of money with no accountability. Obama was in charge during the stimulus passage so he gets to fall on the sword as the most corrupt in history up until this point. Though im quite confident the next guy who gains control will manage to surpass him.

     
    #100     Nov 17, 2011