Is it irresponsible to have kids these days..

These two opinions seem at odds with each other. I'm inclined to agree with the first one.

 

No, it's the welfare state turning evolution on its head by encouraging and supporting the propagation of the laziest and the stupidest.

 

+1

Modern man has been subverting natural selection/survival of the fittest for decades now. The results are not good.

 

good point.

as far as evolution is concerned, those who breed the most breeders are the most successful.

people who can only lead cozy lives (save the money for themselves, not spend it on their own kids) are simply not evolutionary fit. but they do attain high status in our society.

 

Marrying your half sister doesn't count stubby.

 

This should just about sum it up.

<code><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/BXRjmyJFzrU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></code>

 

Dont spend it? reminds as a kid in the school playing fields " u jew" for picking up coppers

 

When the breeding has been made possible by welfare, the breeding produces more lazy and stupid lowlifes for the welfare system. You "thinking" that's successful doesn't surprise me.

 

by "don't spend on kids" I meant "choose not to have kids"

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsJFNQd62Wk