No. I would rather not. However, this is pretty standard procedure and I suspect applies to most banks that trade. Working for an employer that trades always comes with restrictions on your own trading. It's just the way it is
Some of these threads.... I think ya'll just like to argue. Like a bunch of old men at a barber-shop.
I think this is the modern day equivalent of the barber shop, plus we can do our day job on the side!
Need a checker board. Wonder if Baron could somehow or the other embed a small chess or checkerboard that 2 members could go head to head on real time for all the world to see... there'd be a line to play...kinda like setting your quarters on a pool table. Actually that would be pretty fun to watch whilst waiting for the next trade set-up.
%% True, Speedo,not that unemployed is anywhere near self employed+ its a shame they had to pass a bill the size of Dodd-Frank to stop banks [maybe,LOL] from risking taxpayer$ back up for insane leverage .I see AIG Greenburg agrees to return a fraud based multi-million bonus, on AIG fraud+ pay NY AG $9,000,000 fine[FOX Business FEB,2017]
I just said i was unemployed(which was true,btw,although i had a share in some entity).But that was about 10 y.ago.Is it any different now?I`m/was at that time in Russia as well.
It was even more funny back then to explain the local IRS what the brokerage is and why do i need this...lol...