If DB posted at least 5 years of audited broker statements demonstrating that he's made a six-figure profit every year, would you try to master the method he's been giving away all this time? Would the broker statements prove that the method he's giving away is the method responsible for his six-figure annual profits? Wouldn't it make more sense to study his method, apply it to the instrument of your choice and log the results in a spreadsheet, and if the results are positive over a series of 100 trades, practice trading it real-time in a sim account? Wouldn't that be a personally responsible way to try and learn to trade, a way that would give you the ammo you need to trust your own trading, and a way that costs nothing but your time (which you're spending quite a bit of reading and posting on ET anyhow)?
What do you require? Uploaded copies of various pink and yellow 'post-it' notes inscribed with personal reminders? Don't ask such ludicrous questions DB. Send me your email address, I will personally invite you to an all expenses paid visit to my London offices. The first class travel arrangements alone will make the journey worthwhile, assuming you're an economy class type of guy.
No post-its, no travel. Just post your plan. If you choose not to, that's perfectly okay. Let's just not fog up the issue.
These threads are hilarious. I'm not saying DB or Doji are or aren't profitable but what I don't understand is why either one feels the need to defend themselves? If you're profitable, who cares? It's bloody stupid to argue with people on here. You can't win. For the record, I think both are probably profitable. How profitable? I don't know.