Is Chairmen Bernake Incompetent?

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by mahram, May 23, 2006.

Is Bernake Incompetent

  1. yes

    48 vote(s)
    57.1%
  2. no

    36 vote(s)
    42.9%
  1. Thank you, amazon next..
     
    #51     May 30, 2006
  2. ilganzo

    ilganzo

    Ha! If you call Bernanke incompetenet, how do you call Rumsfield and W?
     
    #52     May 31, 2006
  3. ktm

    ktm

    And given the comments and paucity of high quality insight posted on the matter in this thread, do you really think those casting votes are in any position to be able to assess his performance? Right.
     
    #53     May 31, 2006
  4. delta1

    delta1

    I agree with that.
     
    #54     May 31, 2006
  5. [spoken in a haughty British accent with a scone stuck up his a**]
     
    #55     May 31, 2006
  6. say what you will about Mr. Bernanke. But Bernanke and Cohn together will be unbeatable.

    fireworks in the offing. this could be the decade of "swing."
     
    #56     May 31, 2006
  7. Pabst

    Pabst

    The majority of Americans, even apparently many "traders" who should possess cynicism beyond the average degree, are captivated by the cult of personality. Perhaps it's rooted in our obsession with movies and television. Greenspan acted like a Fed chairman and Barry Bonds is despised because he doesn't play the role of humble power-hitting superstar. Appearances over the long haul are meaningless yet as we see with the President's low approval marks, the "people" hunger for style over substance.

    As someone who has nearly a quarter century trading experience I can state the following, markets behave independently of Fed policy. That's not to say there's a negative correlation between the targeted Funds rate and asset values but we all should have ample anecdotal evidence to see the disconnects. To wit: the Fed eased feverishly throughout 2001-2002 and stocks continued to tank. In reverse this entire three year up move in stocks/real estate has occurred during a tightening phase. Blaming or lauding the Fed for the long term performance of any particular asset class is folly.

    All that aside, it's CLEARLY proper that the Fed "listen" to Treasury market participants. Greenspan mentioned several times during the giant ease cycle of 01/02 that the collapse in 2yr yields was a demand for a more accommodative policy. If the "market" senses either deflation or inflation then those trends should be evident in Fed decisions. Neither man nor market nor committee gains conviction without the influence of perception. In other words if I thought massive inflation were a worry but then gold sold off $200 an oz and Crude fell to $45 I would rethink my view. Both natural and prudent, eh? Why hold the Fed to a standard that's different or higher than the markets?
     
    #57     May 31, 2006
  8. hmmm. bonds and greenspan in the same sentence.

    my money is on greenspan.

    cult of nothing.
     
    #58     May 31, 2006
  9. that's barry bonds, not treasury bonds.
     
    #59     Jun 1, 2006
  10. WD40

    WD40

    incompetent?
     
    #60     Jun 22, 2006