Is cable really less secure...

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by VVVWaveRiderVVV, Mar 2, 2003.

  1. At least they are trying.
     
    #11     Mar 2, 2003
  2. Winston

    Winston

    I was informed by my broker I trade w/that the bandwith is the issue for not using cable. Info may be lost in transmission and if many of your neighbors are logged on while your trading that's when you lose the bandwith. I use lowest speed DSL and is almost instantaneous. Have had several down times here in Boston though.
     
    #12     Mar 2, 2003
  3. Yes, that would achieve some security. But know that you ARE sharing the band with the neighbors. Now, are they sitting there sniffing your data? I seriously doubt it. But it is possible. Don't go overboard with fear here. Everything CAN ultimately be defeated. I use Zone Alarm on My laptops when I am in the field, but I don't rely on it to cover the home setups. I just don't think it robust enough for dedicated coverage. That's not to say it's not, just that I don't use it for that. The Linksys should cover most of the lower and middle level intrusion attempts. :)
     
    #13     Mar 2, 2003
  4. TGregg

    TGregg

    While possible, that's pretty rare (AFAIK). I'm running cable, and I get slightly better than DSL speeds (just about 2 mbs).
     
    #14     Mar 2, 2003
  5. Whamo

    Whamo

    I'm not trying to propagate fear. A couple of years ago I would have agreed with you on this one. But teenagers today are getting their Cisco Certifications (CCNA, CCDA, CCNP) while they're in High School. My girlfriend has a student that has all three of these certifications and he helps teach the CCNA course at the local community college on the weekends. Getting a copy of SnifferPro software shouldn't be difficult for him. Hell, when I was in High School I was lucky to have access to a PC:)
     
    #15     Mar 2, 2003
  6. nitro

    nitro

    It doesn't take much to wreak havoc.

    My wife got a virus recently - not sure how...I run my own mail server. The virus sole funciton is to SPAM. My domain has now been added to

    http://www.ordb.org/

    which means that any mail server that checks against this will bounce all the email from my domain.

    nitro :mad: :mad: :mad:
     
    #16     Mar 2, 2003
  7. Thank you to everyone who responded.
     
    #17     Mar 2, 2003
  8. I'm not as worried about terrorists as I am about trojans sending sensitive information out, crackers sniffing around, or scriptkiddies with packetsniffers capturing passwords and acct. numbers.
     
    #18     Mar 2, 2003
  9. Yeah, that's one of the things I'm talking about. I've heard that your local neighborhood is basically a little network and one of the neighborhood kids can more easily hack your machine and/or sniff the data since they are internal to the network.

    Is this the primary security difference between cable and DSL?
     
    #19     Mar 2, 2003
  10. Thanks for the tips, nitro.

    I was originally looking at the Linksys BEFSR11 or the Linksys BEFSX41. The BEFSR11 is a very popular router and "the built-in NAT technology acts as a firewall protecting your internal network." However, the BEFSX41 is only about $10 more expensive and "features an advanced Stateful Packet Inspection firewall" (whatever that is - it just sounds better - does anyone know the effective difference between the two firewall technologies?).

    Are the Linksys router/firewalls not enough? Do the one's you mentioned do a better job? I'm a networking newbie, so I'm looking for the right balance - somewhat powerful, yet relatively easy to setup.

    I'll call the cable provider next week and ask what they use.

    Good article. If anyone else wants to read it: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,844016,00.asp
     
    #20     Mar 2, 2003