is Bush on drug? f*k weird

Discussion in 'Politics' started by apitrader, Apr 29, 2008.

  1. Quite true...however money rules the world even the Mullahs.

     
    #41     Apr 30, 2008
  2. But of course this is exactly why the attempted use of ahmandinejad by this admin as a cloak for aggression is such a farce. The guy as no power at all. And his inflamatory speeches are design to inflame Israeal (which they don't take all that seriously) and pacify his council.

    The guys a joke on wheels. Think Al Gore.
     
    #42     Apr 30, 2008
  3. achilles28

    achilles28

    Bush didn't fuck up, you fuck up.

    Its PREMEDITATED.

    You think Bush stumbled into the SPP signatory room, had a pen shoved in his hand, and randomly signed some 'treaty' his Administration carefully orchestrated since 2003 -- all unbeknowninst to him? Then delivered a glowing press conference on the newly minted agreement he knew nothing about???

    Get off the crack, already.

    Everyone here knows you're a drooling Neocon 'tard because you mercilessly push the Neocon agenda of total war yet say NOTHING about truly conservative issues that run to the HEART of our national security - ie the open borders and North American Union.

    You give Bush a pass on both. Thats why you're a shameful Neocon apologist.
     
    #43     Apr 30, 2008
  4. achilles28

    achilles28


    No, Hapless. Its all premeditated.

    The Government really isn't that incompetent.

    Katrina was premeditated. So was 911. So was Iraq.

    Historically, it was SOP to deploy national guard in preparation for a major hurricane landfall. Plenty of food and water were on hand. So were volunteers and first responders to deliver. But the orders were to sit tight.

    How do we know that? Because after SIX DAYS there was no movement. NOTHING.

    Go read Carol Quigleys Tragedy and Hope, you Klutz.
     
    #44     Apr 30, 2008
  5. achilles28

    achilles28


    Then why are the Neocons holding this guy up as a major threat to our Country?
     
    #45     Apr 30, 2008
  6. Bush is doing what he was tailed to do.
     
    #46     Apr 30, 2008
  7. There always has to be a threat. Look over there and don't look here otherwise we'll be talking about my faults and not his.

    Basic stuff.

    Just like when Bubba cruise missiled the aspirin factory to wag the dog.

     
    #47     Apr 30, 2008
  8. achilles28

    achilles28


    Sorry to burst your bubble, Hapless, but American Concentration Camps are very real.

    Colonel Ollie North - Americas favorite drug dealer - first envisioned Martial Law and Internment Camps for Americans under a Continuity of Government exercise called REX 84.

    This served as a sort of blue print to round up and detain 400,000 American citizens and illegals in the event of some type of disaster.

    Ongoing to REX were numerous Presidential Orders that gave FEMA the statutory authority to round up and intern citizens in CAMPS under the guise of national security disasters - like terror attacks.

    <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RpXh7DCptaQ&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RpXh7DCptaQ&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84#cite_note-0


    Beginning in 1999, Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR), won a series no-bid contracts to build detention camps at undisclosed locations across America. Daniel Hamburg, the articles author and former congressmen, noted, 'the government also contracted with several companies to build thousands of railcars, some reportedly equipped with shackles, ostensibly to transport detainees.
    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/04/ED5OUPQJ7.DTL


    In 2006, KBR won another no-bid contract worth nearly $400 Million to build "vast new detention camps" across the US:

    "The contract -- announced Jan. 24 by the engineering and construction firm KBR -- calls for preparing for "an emergency influx of immigrants, OR to support the rapid development of NEW PROGAMS" in the event of other emergencies, such as "a natural disaster."
    http://news.pacificnews.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=eed74d9d44c30493706fe03f4c9b3a77

    We're told most of these camps are part of Homeland Security's ICE program, ENDGAME, to round and deport 100% illegals aliens by 2012.
    http://www.yuricareport.com/Civil Rights/Endgame.pdf#search="endgame pdf"

    But, like KBR said, the camps could be used to support other pressing needs that arise. Whatever could that mean, Hapless???

    The Government always has a great reason to build concentration camps in our backyard.

    First the Government tells us camps are for the scourge of 'illegals' they do fuck all to stop. Now the Army has built forced labor camps for civilian inmates. Another great reason for concentration camps - Military running American Gulags.
    http://www.apfn.org/apfn/prison_camps.pdf

    Bell Heffner, Congressmen from NC confirmed American forced labor camps are very real.

    http://libertyforlife.com/images/concentration_camps_congress_knowledge.jpg

    Heres a classic - a brief tour of some manned FEMA camps (then-recently renovated. No prisoners, tho. weird).

    <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0P-hvPJPTi4&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0P-hvPJPTi4&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
     
    #48     Apr 30, 2008
  9. achilles28

    achilles28

    '

    So then why are people so hooked on the official spin when a good majority of the time, its a complete fraud?
     
    #49     Apr 30, 2008
  10. Look, it's preferable that they NOT have nukes, but you can' t blame them for wanting to acquire them...
    They're reactions and chest thumping are perfectly logical...and defensive in nature...if you were them, wouldn't YOU want nukes? Not so much to use them, but as a deterrent against US using OURS?

    America respects power and rewards it...let them have all the nukes they want...with unabashed warning that if they fuck up, they will be obliterated...

    PS - I hate the crazy raggers as much as the next guy, but Iran is not a threat to me or my family or to US National security.
     
    #50     Apr 30, 2008