If you became a physician or specialist to get rich then you should have chosen another profession. If you're going to parlay market driven incentives as the only possible motivation for saving the life of a child then ...what can I say.
I agree with your point.If the GOP had ever addressed those issues I would support them starting over,but the GOP never addresses issues like pre existing conditions,all they care about is tort reform and the buying across state line shit
People develop skills and in general expect to be compensated for their investment of time, effort and training. 1) I chose my profession based on public demand, personal interest and aptitude. If I happen to get rich (whatever that is) by doing a good job, what's that to you? 2) strawman argument Now of course if you want that 6 yo treated by someone who's hobby is oncology or developing new medicines ,good luck.
The favorite liberal argument for uni health care was, "well, everyone has to have car insurance"...bla bla bla. So, why do car insurance companies charge more (and denying/dropping drivers coverage) for people with numerous tickets and/or accidents? Why isn't the government going after this corruption?
Yeah I get your point, competition: bad, high prices due to lack of competition :bad. Demanding managed economy to solve your stupid bias's: good
Duly noted and it is written in stone. Any one thinking otherwise has shit for brains. The only question is when?
Are you aware that Cuba delivers more advanced health care than the US? Thriving Medical Tourism... Even with the embargo and corruption.