IRAN Nears Bomb Capability

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Landis82, Sep 9, 2009.

  1. Is it your way of admitting that your previous claim that Israel must seek the US permission was wrong, ignorant and stupid?
     
    #21     Sep 14, 2009
  2. Tresor

    Tresor

    If Americans can learn on past mistakes, it is a way of telling you that your dragging countries into your Jewish wars will end eventually :)
     
    #22     Sep 14, 2009
  3. In other words you can't back up your previous statements nazi boy. That was expected of course, spewing anti-Semitic nonsense is one thing, making sense and participating in serious adult discussions is quite a different matter altogether.
     
    #23     Sep 14, 2009
  4. Tresor

    Tresor


    I am not American, I am European. Therefore you should only remind me of the Holocaust. You should not use the term ''anti-semitic'' - you use this term only when you speak to Americans. Watch this video you little nazi-zionist boy.

    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jUGVPBO9_cA&hl=pl&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jUGVPBO9_cA&hl=pl&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

    If you however choose to anywhere in this forum to mention the Holocaust, I will always be posting this video about 150.000 Jews in Wehrmacht who jointly with Germans invaded my country during WWII:

    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lcDpptCdYY0&hl=pl&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lcDpptCdYY0&hl=pl&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

    Fuck you and your Nazi ancestors :)
     
    #24     Sep 15, 2009
  5. achilles28

    achilles28

    Israel never signed the non-proliferation Treaty. They have 400 nukes.

    The NPT allows for the peaceful use of civilian nuclear power. Which Iran is exercising, until proven otherwise.

    The United States WITHDREW from the ABM Treaty with Russia, to pursue a ballistic missile shield. A first-strike deterrent outlawed by ABMT.

    Finally, Iran has possessed WMD technology for 20 years. Chemical and Bio. If they wanted to kill millions of Israelis (and themselves, in the process), they would have already done so. A small yield nuke doesn't change much.

    And your beloved Israel sold Patriot Missile Technology to the Chinese. I didn't know such treachery was a hallmark of "good friends".
     
    #25     Sep 15, 2009


  6. I was wondering when someone might bring that up some of these points.

    The idea that iran isnt already fully nuclear capable is borderline absurd, when you examine their respective, if secular (to them) allies, and the respective 65 years between the manhattan project and modern international politics.
     
    #26     Sep 15, 2009
  7. achilles28

    achilles28

    Agreed. Russia, Pakistan, North Korea.

    Pakistan went nuclear with China's help. And the US looked the other way while AQ Kahn dealt technology on the blackmarket (stole and sold).

    North Korean bomb material comes from nuke reactors we GAVE them. Iranian ballastic missiles are Skud variants from Nk.

    Americas business is war. Plant a seed (nukes/chems/bio), come back a decade later to mow it down.

    Its a long-term sow-harvest cycle for the Military-Industrial complex that gets a major war every decade. Plus, America gets to throw its weight around by proxy, in the interim.

    Like the sheriff who throws down the gun and tells the boy to pick it up..... 'pick it up, Boy.....!'

    Nobody's hands are clean, on this. Iran would have attacked already, had they wanted. They haven't. Its a non-issue.

    Proliferation is the only problem. But the US ignored AQ Kahn and refused to shut down the border or fortify the ports, post-911.

    There are bigger problems then "Al Kieda is gunna git a bomb and nuke us!" America's leadership are courting disaster. Who needs enemies when our own Government arms them then leaves the backdoor open..?

    Oh yea. Can't forget. American Troops guarding Poppy fields in Afghanistan. Bumper harvest for the Taliban, this year!!

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    #27     Sep 15, 2009
  8. achilles28

    achilles28

    American tax-dollars, hard at work. Protecting the Afghan opium trade.

    Reminds me of how the CIA was caught importing cocaine for sale in American ghettos (BLACK), to support the Contras.

    A rich and colorful history.... :D
     
    #28     Sep 15, 2009
  9. Sure, but it is a rich and colourful history.

    Ever since that pesky-colonial revolution thing, Americans have had there nose in all manner of international affairs.


    Whoulda thunk, might does, actually make right.

    I have mentioned innumerable times on this forum, how opium production trebled while British troops were in a certain province, American troops, the same.

    That is because its not there job to destroy opium crops, the agreed on international mandate is to "fight" the enemy, the Taliban etc.

    Unfortunately, It is a laughable joke, that "winning hearts and minds" kinda lost creedence during vietnam, but even worse, they are following the same path.


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OkoWEMCnLQ


    Its a personal opinion, but what the fuck, basically, you cannot tell me, these people were armed, or that dangerous, running from a mosque after all.

    This is a massacre, not a war.
     
    #29     Sep 15, 2009
  10. Banjo

    Banjo

    Pentagon backs massive missile sale to Turkey

    http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Pentagon_backs_massive_missile_sale_to_Turkey_999.html

    Obama has given Tehran an end-of-September deadline to respond substantively to his offer of diplomatic engagement. But already hawks in the US - backed by hardline pro-Israel organizations - have pressed him to quickly impose "crippling" economic sanctions against Tehran, and some are arguing that he should make preparations for a military attack on Iranian nuclear facilities.

    http://atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/KI15Ak02.html
     
    #30     Sep 15, 2009