Iran Enriched Uranium, Now its the Isreali Response, will they or wont they?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by mahram, Apr 11, 2006.

How high would oil go if Isreal attacks

  1. 70-80

    12 vote(s)
    12.4%
  2. 80-90

    23 vote(s)
    23.7%
  3. 100-110

    33 vote(s)
    34.0%
  4. You dont even want to know? :P

    29 vote(s)
    29.9%
  1. Ricter

    Ricter

    Is that ^ the "you're either for us, or against us" argument?
     
    #161     Apr 17, 2006
  2. If Muslim extremists who:

    --make daily rants against the West and the US in particular,

    --subsidize terrorists who target and blow up little kids and kidnap and decapitate civilians,

    --provide Iraqi terrorists with improved IEDs that are inflicting casualties on our troops,

    --threaten to annihilate Israel,

    --have a history of waging war on infidels,

    --ETC,

    ever get their hands on nukes, I will surely feel better knowing that, prior to them acquiring/manufacturing nuclear weapons, I had a better chance of getting hit by lightning than being killed by them.

    Besides, this is all Bush's fault. If we get nuked, too bad so sad, we deserve it because we elected Bush.

    And of course a Dem would solve all this. Why? Because they're not Bush, who only makes the world hate us, invades countries for oil to fatten up his personal bank account, and was behind the events of 9/11 - heck, he was probably laughing his ass off when the disguised military planes slammed into the Pentagon and the WTC. Laughing all the way to the bank was our C in C, yessiree.

    Follow the money, it never lies. Never, ever, ever, .....
     
    #162     Apr 17, 2006
  3. 1000

    1000

    More like a parrot for the Mullah's with a gun to his head. Probably a drop out like the suicide bomber today, killing innocent women and children. Those women and children probably didn't even care/understand anything about this macro economic / geopolitical thing that is going on.

    Israel probably will have to take Iran out unilaterally if Iran aggresses, unless there is another terror attack on US/foreign soil, in which case there will be a multilateral response.

    Sadly I think both will be true. All I can say is that my blood is still boiling. Boiling because of the inaction of the Muslims/Arabs, and boiling because after 9/11 the Americans and Europeans (Bush bashing) still don't understand this clear and present danger.

    What do you want another 9/11 or two? Do you want more deaths? Is that what you believe in?
     
    #163     Apr 17, 2006
  4. achilles28

    achilles28


    Swine?? You have no class. Am I an anti-semite now too?


    The Iranian threat is totally hollow intended only to goad the easily fooled - like yourself - behind a US-led attack.

    The Mullahs WANT the US to attack because it'll rally popular support behind their unpopular Government and reinvigorate national desire for nuclear weapons.

    The result? Post-attack, the Mullahs can double nuclear weapons research while enjoying renewed support for their previously unpopular (and precarious) Government.

    That is classic mass-mind control:


    " the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."

    Hermann Wilhelm Göring, Nazi founder of the Gestapo



    Absent US instigation, Iranians strongly oppose the Mullahs. Let nature take its course and with a little subterfuge in the right direction, the Mullahs will go down by themselves.
     
    #164     Apr 17, 2006
  5. Pabst

    Pabst

    In the late 1980's, following Iran's upset loss to Iraq, the Western press was full of anecdotal gossip about satellite dish owning Iranians who were becoming secular bourgeois and learning to dig the West. Then we started hearing the tired yarns about how Joe Iranian was tired of the Mullahs. The Muslim street was yearning for a new anti religious revolution that would instill leadership more tolerant of their whacking off to American porno films while swigging from a bottle of Jack. The same story was relayed from Pakistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia etal. Maybe by the next century it'll work out that way.
     
    #165     Apr 17, 2006
  6. achilles28

    achilles28

    As opposed to the US peaceniks who made daily rants against paper tigers like Iraq (now Iran) - and then actually invade them.




    As opposed to the atrocities the IDF regularly perpetrates on defenseless Palestinian families with your tax dollars.

    But I know, that doesn't count ;)


    I guess you missed the Daily Show clip where a 4-star General was asked to elaborate on what actual *proof* the IED's in question were of Iran origin.

    Much to the audiences surprise, he admitted there was no hard evidence for such a claim.

    I see a pattern forming. Don't you?


    Empty rhetoric intended to bait the easily manipulated like yourself behind an attack that will only serve the Mullahs agenda. Not weaken it.



    Yes, much unlike the long history of bloodshed perpetrated by Americans against the indigenous indians and black slaves, the English against their African/Indian/Far east colonies, or any single other anglo-saxon nation against any contemporaneous inferior country. In history.

    Wake up, man. You are blind.



    --ETC,

    etc.




    Good for you. You're a real champ.




    Mindless kool-aid drinkers can only think in terms of blue and red.

    In your world, what makes you think if Im against Bush, it means im for Gore, or Kerry, or Kkklinton?


    No, if a dem was in office, he'd be doing the exact same fucking thing.

    There is no difference between either party. Bigger Government, less freedom - everytime.

    Haven't you figured that out yet?



    If there was one salient point we can take away from the Founders teachings: we can always, always trust our Government no matter what ;)


    Upset I'm picking on Bush?

    Go check out the OKC bombing.

    Three bombs were reportedly removed from the Federal Building - undetonated - after the blast.

    All three were reported as large and of a 'highly sophisticated' design.

    Ask yourself: how could a small timer like McVeigh plant three, large bombs inside a federally controlled building? Let alone, put them together himself?



    And who's making bank from these paper tiger threats you piss your pants too at night? Big Government. Big Oil. Big Defense.

    And Big Banks (who claim the right to interest on the massive national debt they create out of nothing).

    Military-industrial-financial complex. War for profit.
     
    #166     Apr 17, 2006
  7. Pabst

    Pabst

    Wow. The truth comes out. A Cynthia McKinney type mental patient rant! Calling Captain Queeq: You're strawberries are covered in oil.......
     
    #167     Apr 17, 2006
  8. 1000

    1000

    OK, achilles28, if you know it all.
    Tell me about Abu-Ladan.
    Tell me about the Muslim Brotherhood's long-term worldwide strategy for establishing Islamic supremacy in the West.
    Tell me about Larbi Kechat.
    Tell me about Al-Jezeera TV and its objectives.
    Tell me about Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi.
    Tell me about "The Project."
     
    #168     Apr 17, 2006
  9. achilles28

    achilles28


    Why are you so inclined to believe that coming from Iraq but not Iran?

    If you actual meet some Iranians, I'd think you'd find they're a different lot all together.

    And if you take a real close look at history, Iranian political sentiment only polarized until after the CIAs puppet dictator (the Shah) was expunged.

    Coincidence? I know you're smarter than that.
     
    #169     Apr 17, 2006
  10. toc

    toc

    'Military-industrial-financial complex. War for profit.'

    Blame all the problems of Islamic world on West and Israel.......and never come out of the shell, veil and paranoia of disinformation and Mullah logic and hurt 1.2 Billion people all along the way.

    Mullahs are very dangerous, fanatic and brutal people and they should/will never be allowed to have nukes.

    The plan of the west is to start bombing Iran's nuke labs......if Mullahs still remain in power, fine, but be ready to be bombed again. West will go quiet after the nuke labs are destroyed. It will be upto Iran to up the ante and then surely have its military assets destroyed and set back by 20 years.
     
    #170     Apr 17, 2006