Iran Enriched Uranium, Now its the Isreali Response, will they or wont they?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by mahram, Apr 11, 2006.

How high would oil go if Isreal attacks

  1. 70-80

    12 vote(s)
    12.4%
  2. 80-90

    23 vote(s)
    23.7%
  3. 100-110

    33 vote(s)
    34.0%
  4. You dont even want to know? :P

    29 vote(s)
    29.9%
  1. 1000

    1000

    The joke is that the Iranian capability is crap, and you are brainwashed to think something that isn't.:cool:
     
    #111     Apr 14, 2006
  2. 1000

    1000

    Yeah, and you are probably still in your nappy.:p
     
    #112     Apr 14, 2006
  3. 1000

    1000

    Maybe you wouldn't. YOU DIG. And your tax dollars are going to support the Chinese totalitarian regime that has let down its people (or maybe Wal-Mart does not want you to know about the land grab, that's killing innocent Chinese people).
     
    #113     Apr 14, 2006
  4. achilles28

    achilles28

    I thought you said Irans rhetoric was just bait?

    So soon you forget, eh?

    Iran isn't going to do shit with nukes. Wake up.
     
    #114     Apr 14, 2006
  5. achilles28

    achilles28


    No. The joke is your sorry grasp of the english language.

    I never said Iran had nukes or were close to getting them. Stupid.
     
    #115     Apr 15, 2006
  6. toc

    toc

    'How about we nuke Isreal instead and let the arabs repopulate? Problem solved.'

    Problem not solved.....why blame a tiny, minute, very small, peaceful survivalist minded nation for all your problems................. the real problem will be in next 20 years when the oil runs out or alternative source is found to be cheaper and more efficient. Then MULLAHS with nukes will run the world into a choas blackmailing wealthy nations to feed and greed them WITH WESTERN TAX DOLLARS.

    Other than oil, MULLAH, ARAB, ISLAMIC world has nothing to talk about or lean on. I cannot imagine the hungry muslims lured into hearing the MULLAH talk and brainwashed into believing the ALL their hunger is because of the WEST, Israel and non-Islamic nations. Then these MULLAHS will send these half fed youths into suicide army type acts and the only answer would be massive ariel bombing on these MULLAH armies and lots of brainwashed youths slaughtered like sheep. Guess anywhere the Islamics are they are causing problems, US, Russia, UK, Nigeria, India, even China and other African nations.

    I believe that one generation is good enough to change the course of a nation or group of nations. 20 years is around one generation, instead of reaching for nukes and wmds, the Islamic nations should seek to develop civilian technologies that bring progress and peace and make world a more comfortable place to live. It is not too late to come back into the civilized way of thinking and living.
     
    #116     Apr 15, 2006
  7. achilles28

    achilles28


    I don't. My comment was a facetious response to your disgusting pleas for an Iranian nuclear holocaust.

    The Jews can do whatever they like. But assuming moral authority in geopolitical affairs and the sole right to nuclear weapons in the middle east is laughable.

    No nation has used nuclear weapons preemptively. Confidently proclaiming Iran will be the first is idiocy.



    What a load of BS.





    Your arguments are predicated on nothing more than a lengthy string of assumptions whose probability is so small to render your points irrelevant.

    The United States and Soviet Union survived with nukes. There is no reason why Israel and Iran can't.



    I agree wholeheartedly.

    And I also believe calls for an Iranian nuclear holocaust fit squarely outside that paradigm of rationale and constructive dialogue and diplomacy.

    Dont you?


    You want to deny Arabs the ability to develop nukes?

    Develop free energy and watch their trillions in oil reserves turn to dust over night.

    Of course, this will never happen. The Corporate plutocrats (military industrial complex) are well in control of this country - and yours. Suffice to say, there is far more profit in a controlled energy paradigm (owned and controlled by them), war and the potential for war then free energy could ever provide.
     
    #117     Apr 15, 2006
  8. traderob

    traderob

    I don't think that would solve the problem. Take the time to read mainstream Islamic websites. They are very clear that world domination is the goal of Islam and that any muslim not helping in some way towards this goal is at odds with the Koran. They certainly consider Israel an unbearable insult - that a non-Islamic state is in the center of the Muslim world- but as soon as Israel is gone they would see this as proof of God's truth and gain even more fervor to expand.
     
    #118     Apr 15, 2006
  9. achilles28

    achilles28


    First. Mainstream Muslims aren't extremists or divisionists. They are moderates. Much like Protestant/Catholics in the US.

    Assuming Islamic extremism represents the majority - or even a large minority of the Muslim world - is nonsense. This 'radical' Muslim stereotype is nothing more than a convenient strawman held up to scare the masses behind a predetermined agenda of war and control.

    Your asseration of mainstream radicalism is weak.


    Second. Even if the majority of Muslims are radicals (which they arent), and support world Islamic domination, so what?

    Islamic nations the world over are paper tigers. They've got nothing to back up their pie-in-the-sky fantasies of 'world domination'.

    The Anglo-saxon alliance could crush them in a heartbeat.

    Suggesting these fleas on an elephants ass are a threat to its security is ridiculous.

    Please.
     
    #119     Apr 15, 2006
  10. Landak

    Landak

    Sorry but I just cannot agree with these sentiments at all.
    I live in what is considered a very moderate, enlightened majority muslim country. It is grossly inaccurate to suggest that they are comparable to Protestants/catholics in the US.
    Those born Muslims here are liable to be imprisoned if they do not strictly ahere to the tenets of the faith. As for leaving islam-that is not possible and indeed an extremist party that runs one state would wish to put them to death, as in Shariah Law. Thankfully that is not yet happening. Meaningful debate does not exist on matters pertaining to their religion.
    As for an 'Anglo-Saxon' alliance wiping them off the map-well sadly as we have seen they do not really play by the Queensbury rules, do they? It is rather hard to beat them.
     
    #120     Apr 15, 2006