Is the 899-903 area measured due to the resting demand that was met or because of the initiated buying out of that area. PLEASE let the market take out the 900 level and the corresponding 875 level this week! I still have a tight grip on that lawn chair.
Here you go (new initiated buying off 899's created zone)......... http://www.charthub.com/images/2009/06/21/ESCD_Sep.png Tbug Monday cash session open........... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWRs-xT113Q&feature=related :eek: Tbug Monday EOD action........... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yW2NPfvTFk&feature=related
Now you might REALLY get it (context of recent price action)........... http://www.charthub.com/images/2009/06/21/ESCD_Sep.png BTW Thanks......and Happy Father's Day to all the Dad's out there!!!
AMT... Here is a pic of the latest CDV reading vs ES price points as of Friday at EOD... Using 1 point price range bar and CDV setup as usual... Seems like the buyers that were holding for a couple of days since 6/17/2009 have been.... evaporated.. eliminated.. goners... Vat Doest Thou Think... ? The CDV on 6-19-2009 went lower than the CDV at the low of 899 on Wednesday...although the ES price closed higher... Is Distribution Dan Hard At Work Here... We may or may not get a FED happy FOMC meeting next week rally back up to 928 or 940 ... but it would be a great sell if it did ... mai non?
I can see how you draw the 899.25 and 903.00 lines on the price chart and -114,100 on the CD chart, but what is the -102,100 line anchored to?
Level within the typical 3 to 4 point Delta Zones that had me at about 12,000 "net" contracts........also the price test to the exact 903.00 tick level latter on solidified for me to go with 903.00 over 903.25 as the upper end of the zone. Trading off the bounce of the 899's to the 903.00 level put us at about 12,000 contracts net positve (nice even number to work with). The 12,000 contracts is a decent amount of "net" resting to call it a mild zone and 903.00 was tested so far once (so for myself, I adjusted the upper zone price level from 903.25 down a tick to 903.00.......good enough). The 102,100 is anchored to the pass through 903.00 level AFTER the small pullback to 902.00 which put us at 12,000 even for example purposes. Interpolation my friend....interpolation!
Yes there is some "skew" affect as a result of rollover and everyone jumping on the SHORT boat with the new contract. For the most part though, the bounce off 899's has been SOLD aggressively and Monday/Tuesday will be very key trade days imo.......we have more "tension" built up in the order flow bias again.........COOL! :eek:
YaFoal... Cool Beans... Accumulation Andy has been smacked down by Distribution Dan... :eek: ... May The Inventory Be Width You... HAVE STOP <img src="http://www.enflow.com/p.gif"> WILL TRADE
Depending on the intrabar tick order within the 2nd bar prior to 10:19 (candle low at 902.00), wouldn't you consider the second buying pulse off the 899.25 low to have launched from 902.00 rather than 903.00? That would place the higher delta line at -106,000 rather than -102,100 for a 8k (also a round number...) I'm making the implicit assumption that only the 1st buying pulse off the 899.25 low is used for inventory calculation.
The second buy pulse off 902.00 through 903.00 level is good to have imo, as the second round of initiated buying in this zone gives good definition to the upper end of a zone from 903.00-899.25. Also, I want to have a good zone with a minimum of three points to a maximum of 4 points (my experience shows this is significant to proper zone definition). A zone from 899.25 to 902.00 with about 8,000 contracts and only 2.75 points of range is just not of the significance needed imo.....it is close but just shy of what is good zone criteria.