OK, well the reason I asked was because if this 'simplicity' is the signal, then identifying which signals to take in real-time is extremely hard. Especially, if ones stops are not as flexible as AMT's. My best, MK
From what I've learned so far, each of the components is rather simple, but to make it work, you have to put them together in a certain way that you may, as a whole, deem complex. Taking counter-trend signals without "context" (zones, long/short inventory), "order flow bias" (cumulative delta divergence), "money management" (position sizing, scale-out targets, position recycling/defensive target reset, hard-stop location) and long-term trend bias, wouldn't be enough by itself.
JMon... Would you confirm we have a positive CDV reading here... Low at 923 Sep Contract double bottom with a Higher CDV reading...at 10:49am Eastern or 7:49 Pacific time What say ye...?
You have my email. Send several comparison screenshots to me. I may have to ask you many questions, so be prepared for that. I may be able to help as I have a bit of extra time this week.
I think... That positive CDV divergence is now OVA... with the new intraday low in the sep ES and also the CDV moving down hard past its low on June 10th...
AMT, can you comment on this chart? i see about 50k net longs that should trigger a long/buy signal thanks, http://content.screencast.com/users...62-4bdd-ad3e-fe6064f79492/2009-06-15_1057.png
JMon'.... can you comment on this.... Here is a pic... We made a low on June 10th at 923 Sep ES and today we made a double bottom low at 923 this moring on a higher CDV... its only an intraday minor minor CDV postiive divergence (its now ova since the CDV crashed down farther now) but at the time was it not a positive (albeit minor) CDV divergence... not that it in any way negated the large selling inventory up at 946 to 955... just trying to see if we had a minor intraday pos divergence... ? or Maybe since the Primary contract on June 10th was the June Contract... its hard to measure this... ?... June across to Sep...