Yes.......btw, DTN recently put a bunch of coin into their data infrastructure/servers so they have been very strong as of late!!!
I'm guessing that CDV signals worked flawlessly on their own merit in the early days of delta use, but the simple patterns quickly self-destructed as ubiquitous use picked up. IMHO, if not backed up by CONTEXT and MAGNITUDE, those signals can be used by program trading to "fake" and extract profits away from unsuspecting traders who use a ruler on paper instead of MIT level math... caveat emptor. D.
Fortunately in about the last 4 years of heavy delta use, I have not noticed any degradation in the set ups I use. The ability to analyze order flow against the price action has a fundamental robustness to it.
DTN and barchart data both drop trades...OEC data imo is better. http://www.sierrachart.com/supportboard/showpost.php?p=126717&postcount=11 ps...up to you DTN guys to ask now
DTN.IQ run against Zenfire and TT feed are all pulling equal runs.....I have not ever found problems with DTN.IQ feed in my years of use.
Sierra advertises barchart data as their real time data feed. Barchart and DTN give similar CDV. Sierra administration has confirmed that barchart data drops trades. However anyone decides is their business.
Barchart and DTN.IQ are separate companies......they have nothing in common. http://realtime.barchart.com/ourdata.asp http://www.dtniq.com/template.cfm?navgroup=otherlist1&urlcode=422&view=1 I am extremely comfortable with DTN.IQ feed......just never had any problems.
AMT, your awesome, this thread is awesome and your willingness to share is awesome. Some have questioned the reliability of my CDV in the charts that I have posted. I and others have investigated these questions. I have posted the findings of these questions. How you or anyone else interprets these findings are up to the individuals.
Yes that is all fine.......I was just wondering who said and has properly shown (from who you have talked to) that DTN.IQ data is in question.....that is all.