Inventory Grab Alert 4/30/09!

Discussion in 'Trading' started by AMT4SWA, May 1, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Yes......this is potentially a VERY REACTIVE zone that has been built here......great potential here. :)
     
    #1251     Jun 2, 2009
  2. Also, just as a heads up.....when these type zones influence price participation.......it moves fast, both up or down once price starts running! :)
     
    #1252     Jun 2, 2009
  3. The shorts don't seem to be budging for now (4:00pm EST), but neither are the longs from the 940 area.

    I'm I correct in saying that there is roughly 80K short held inventory in the 44.25-49 zone and ~30K in the 46-49 zone?
     
    #1253     Jun 2, 2009
  4. i am happy to report that after applying my highly intuitive predictive model:

    36.44
    +0.05 (0.14%)
    Jun 2 - Close



    back to your guys ES trading now :)
     
    #1254     Jun 2, 2009
  5. 44.25-49.00 has net short position built up of roughly 48,000 contracts. the 46.00 - 49.00 area I mentioned before is not an area you need a measure for.......the overall held inventory of 48,000 is all you have to pay attention too. If this group of inventory "bails" you will notice it....I assure you! :eek: :)
     
    #1255     Jun 2, 2009
  6. AMT do I understand it correctly that this is a large amount of short inventory compared to what you usually see? if so, does this large size suggest an imminent large move?
     
    #1256     Jun 2, 2009
  7. Ahhhhhhhhh......YES! :)

    There is great potential movement of price off zones that grow this big (my experience has shown this type of build up IS SIGNIFICANT......some very big players are making a BIG BET here). :cool:
     
    #1257     Jun 2, 2009
  8. But the delta never gives any good info to trade from, so just ignore everything you see here......:eek:

    :D :p :D


    BTW, side scalp selling every 947's rotation end part of day was almost like work......LOL! :eek:
     
    #1258     Jun 2, 2009
  9. but the significant move may still prove to be to the upside even though the odds are that ES tanks, right?
     
    #1259     Jun 2, 2009
  10. I think I see where you come up with the 48K, but what about counting the CD readings from 1:30EST onwards when price traded the 44.25-47.75? See attached, am I missing something or do I perhaps have a data issue?
     
    #1260     Jun 2, 2009
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.