Intuition Amplifiers 2

Please listen to today's ESM13 opening sounds. It is work in progress, but you will get the idea.

Cheers,
MAESTRO

 

That's very interesting and possibly cracking open the intuitive link. I'd need to see the chart movement in 3D so I could link the sounds to the current content and also the MTF context. It's way beyond a simple 2D view and moving into what I referred to as each cycle having its own dimensions yet the whole orchestra playing together.

Niederhoffer talks about the MTF interplay as a symphony and I like that description as that is how the market works imo. I've used tick speed sounds but that only highlights the acceleration and deceleration of price and helps tune you into the waveform . No one I know of has done what you're doing.

It's a fantastic idea to be swathed in the sounds of the market and hearing the trend run, the emergency reversals and the cacophony of chop conflicts. I'm up for more and especially so if it is links to the visual aspect which I know you are working on. Nice one indeed Mr. Maestro

 

Im not sure of the math behind regression, But I have this regression line and regression channel drawing on TOS. I can confirm that price always goes towards the line. Its just too bad that the line goes towards price . If you don't have a regression tool you can always use a moving average that is very short term. It truly is amazing how the average of recent points is so close to recent points ! If you like that, try a weighted moving average to double your profits.

 

To amplify your intuition, stop limiting your intuition. Once this is done your intuition has maxed out. But one can still amplify their profits through leverage.

I did not get to read about the eeg machine.I guess that will do too

 

You're a very smart entity, Mr M, and always a pleasure to read.

What are those indicators? In what sense are they orthogonal? If you will -- please post a picture .

 

Yes that's allot of indicators, Are they related to "Intuition Amplifying 2" ?

 

An intuition is a conception in which incompleteness or vagueness of comprehended information is substituted by special mechanisms for producing the feelings of coherence and confidence. Intuitive decision making is mainly based on the concept of “intellectual intuition” that could also be used for designating forms of immediate knowledge which are not sensorial and primarily deal with philosophical concepts, formal mathematical relations or theories. Realizing two different forms of intuition is important. For instance, the statement: “Every natural number has a successor” is intuitively acceptable statement and it is an example of “intellectual intuition”. On another hand, the intuitive evaluation of the weight of an object or of the speed of a moving body would represent “sensorial intuitions”. Certainly, no clear-cut distinction is possible, but the terminology related to intuition is still very confusing to many people. Sometimes, intuition is referred to as a global guess for which an individual is not able to offer a clear and complete justification. Very often intuition means an elementary, common sense, popular, primitive form of knowledge, as opposed to philosophers, like Spinoza for whom intuition is the highest form of knowledge through scientific conceptions and interpretations. According to Poincaré, for example, no genuine creative activity is possible in science and/or mathematics without intuition. Trading, in my opinion, is not different. My point of view is that only highly developed intuitions could lead to consistently successful trading, designing robust trading systems and managing the money in general. The fact that there is very little knowledge about the actual mechanisms of developing useful and reliable intuition abilities makes the subject of my research that much more attractive to me.

 

Nice post, but I miss the attraction you have to it. You are syaing you use intuition to build a system but not actually trade. the trading and money management is nothing close to intuition.

So intuition is simply a filter for you, you decide what to learn of do based on intuition.

But you say intuition can be wrong, it is a means to make sense of what we do not have time to make sense of.

Filtering makes work manageable, but filtering also removes ideas off the table. This helps progress, but what was left off the table?

For instance, the idea that a holy grail is shot on the floor based on ones intuition.

This can be a disaster. Luckily intuition seems to have developed a trick to avoid such disasters. That part amazes me. I call it stupidity but hey what ever works! Truthfully, the stupid have a head start in the game if they are smart enough to at least find this site.

 

My view of the term “intuition” is that intuition expresses our instinctual beliefs in the existence of some ultimate, absolutely reliable certainties. In a world of ultimate uncertainties (such as trading) our practical decisions cannot only rely on theoretically based assumptions. We, therefore, always feel the fundamental need “to see” with our mind, as we see with our eyes to validate those assumptions. In order to survive in the information driven society and specifically in the areas of intellectual activities like trading, we have to act in accordance with a given, credible reality that could be verified intellectually. Although animals are not bothered by credibility of their assumptions thus relying 100% on their sensorial intuition, we, humans, put a lot more weight on our “Intellectual Intuition”.

 

To achieve the desired efficiency of verification procedures for our “Intellectual Intuition” a new form of certitude has been invented – knowledge base. Using established knowledge as the reference point for our Intellectual Intuition has created a very strong stimuli for our development as species. The process of logical verification of intuition removed the need for the verification process based on our sensory based experimentation. It needs to be said though, that our logic by itself does not offer an absolute, practically valuable certitude but a conventional form of acceptance. There is still, of course, the need for a behavioral, practical and sensory verification of our intuitive assumptions. However, our intellectually synthesized implicitly meaningful certitudes are definitely capable of creating the instinctual belief in the existence of such ultimate certitudes and, consequently, they justify the quest for them. It was probably Descartes who best expressed this view: If knowledge is always the product of an active mind, one has to find in the mind itself the criteria through which a certain truth may be distinguished from uncertain appearances”.