By enhancing your above attempt, a lot of answers could become available. To cut to the chase, just think of very thick trunks composed of entwined sinews. these are built by everyone as they sleep. Naturally the mind chooses to produce the peptides required to service this growing system. My picture is easy to grasp. Another aspect is the shortcuts built within these trunks. By having to pass through fewer connections the processing speeds up. I trade at market capacities and I process information groups at warp speed. It is all subconscious and I never lack the "supplies" to service my synapses needs. I am built to hold and reverse. I just take. Each profit segment comes into being as a trend exhausts itself by using 1 of 10 subsets of End Effects. So the massive trunk I have that is filled with all the shortcuts needed just keeps cycling in the trading loop. Others in this thread inductively state that it is not possible to do something totally unecessary. Cetainly they are correct for the wrong reasoning. What is it like to be able to have total mental control over all the elements of market information groups? What is it like to always, in the Present, "KNOW THAT YOU KNOW? Take you car out for a drive. Open a book and read. In trading, it is like getting out a chess board and looking at it as if two variables are represented and the board has named locations. The independent variable is on the offensive and the dependent variable has to do what is needed to CONTINUE THE TREND. If you play chess, do you know when the game is over or are you told when the game is over? For trading to take the full offer of the market, I examine five major sinews concurrently (in parallel) and they move from named spot to named spot until the market chooses THE subset out of ten to use for taking profits. In a trend, which is you making money, the trend comes to an end when it uses all the spaces available in that specific set of moves from spot to spot. A small finite world. Begin simply, with a checker board and checkers and there is no competition. Can you visualize moving as simply as possible with one piece and coming to the side of the board before you come to the other end of the board? Spot by spot is bar by bar. You can come to the end of movement by reaching the side of the board. Potential traders cannot be told they cannot move up/down. They are too slow mentally to grasp this. In ET, most contributors do not know the independent variable. Deduction is the only allowable reasoning in trading. There is NO future in trading Predicting is NOT a technique that works with respect to the Present. NO one has ever traded in the future. Face it, you only trade in the present move after move. I use columns on my log. The dependent variable is on the left. I watch the independent variable progress by testing each bar I am given permission to measure. I put the independent variable columns across the log in the sequence in which they appear in a trend. I have an EVENT column. I fill it in each bar with the name of the event in the independent variable. 50% of the day the word is WAIT (meaning wait to measure as I hold while in the market making profits) There I sit. Every 300 seconds I fill in a row as I continue all day long to make money profit segment by profit segment. It is not easy to build a log for what you do. the reason is that you are not organized and you have no perception of markets. You see screens but you have no inference to match your sensing operators. There are no trunks and sinews built in your mind as you sleep and your mind does not work to meld together what it stored all day long before you went to sleep. It is just a mess for you. But, on the otherhand, my mind is ully differentiation and operates at warp speed. As you see in ET for most posters it is "Too Late" for mind building. The mind's inference is so jumbled and soo far afield during waking hours. All I do is test adjacent bars. .... LOL........
Here is the list. Read it and throw it away. I color the space the shape occupies. First pass is just by Sets as in Set Theory. Sets have elements (..) I'll define a few as examples so you can see how mathematics precisely defines all possibilities in market operation. The issue of defining a market as a complete and closed system is over forever. human capability greatly exceeds mrket operation capability. ET is not capable of indenting. you can save and enhance the indents. Others here have the elements in the subsets. Market System (56) Trending (21) Independent variable Set (11) Dependent variable Set (10) End Effects (35) Frist subset (13) 2nd (8) 3rd (2) 4 through 6 (each) 7 (4) 8 (2) 9 (2) place holder (1) I gave marketsurfer's programmer(s) an elemnt of the first subset so he could always make money compounding winning trades as simply as possible. In the single pattern of trends in markets, a trend can be extremely short. this is the first peak of the independent variable "accelerating" In econometrics we get to withness this now as what is called a climax run. To wit: (NewP1 - Assigned P1) < (Third P1 - New P1) = true. True is a term used in proofs in logic. Feel free to ask for any other element of the Market Operation set. In dry humor terms, there is a market alphabet. Trends are three word sentences. Strangely, exhausted trends need to be punctuated. End Effects are distinct punctuation marks. As a consequence the market can be read using the language of the markets. the mathematics is an Algebra as expected. Every element (56) is specifically and uniquely defined as an expression. In this algebra there are groupings connected by ooperators. As expected the grouping have categorical mathematical names: critria, filters, formulae, rules and strategies. The market dictates that all measures be "relative". therefore, acommon class of coding must be used. In a building on Market Street in the 70's and owned by UCSC two 360's back to back were used to get this seed. RDBMS came about in time. A relative DataBase Management System is deeply logical and consumate for taking the full offer of the market. again if you want any particular expression just ask. For traders, the manifestation of the system is done with highlights on panes. As can be visualized, the turns appear on forming bars during their formation once no alternative uniquely defined definition is possible. All of this comes from deductive reasoning. A fully differentiated spectrum will exist in the mind and the mind builds it while sleep ensues. As I explained in the lost thread, before, there is a turning point in the mind's work. It is known to the human when his mind crosses the line in the sand. What wasn't before is then happening after. the mind either finishes it melding job or not during the sleep afforded. When the mind is superior enough it can finish melding the subconscious prior expereince with the consciosness. As this continues, then and only then does the human get the mind's questions upon arising. The mind is infilling in the spectrum with a ranked order of NEEDS. By making the question a conscious one, the human can steer and focus where sensing is needed. I know you are not asking for my input. thats the way it goes. UCSC is a consortium of 29 colleges and universities including about 6 traing hospitals. It had 5 division in those days; I managed two of them. For science oriented perople, testing of systems is done by the "verify" command. All building blocks are verified as the system is built. the system begins with the granularity of the independent and dpendent variable. you can percieve that time is not a variable; instead the elements form "events" and the five sinews in parallel produce the systemic operational definition.
i use the word detective in place of deduction and for the rest that 's quoted you have an abundance of the norapinephrine
Cybernetics - YES AI - YES Quantum Activist - YES Religion - YES Philosophy - YES Psychology YES Math - YES Engineering - YES Church of Scientology - OVER MY DEAD BODY!!!! Don't ever bring it up!!!!
I DEFINITELY do not want to bring in a discussion of religion onto this excellent thread, but would you not be better to use words like 'acknowledgment of a cosmic type Force/Laws/Creation' rather than religion? I believe that the entire Universe exerts a force/Laws, which loops on itself and further creates. Every atom in the universe is part of that Force/Law.
There were about 30 religious leaders from as many religions sitting around a campfire in heaven,all impressing the various virtues of their chosen faiths,talking long into the nite ,at the end of one of the logs sat a caveman with a very limited vocabulary,as they were all getting ready to head off for bed,the caveman being silent all thru the night, wondering how he got their without it, asked " what's theology "
The Self Aware Universe, (1 hour audio) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PS0e_hBPtH4 ------------------------------- Interview with Goswami (73 mins audio) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MU9FVuo2-Es -------------------------------- What the blip do we know? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioONhpIJ-NY "Documentary. What the Bleep Do We Know!? is a 2004 film that combines documentary-style interviews, computer-animated graphics, and a narrative that posits a spiritual connection between quantum physics and consciousness."
I agree, however, the word "religion" has been associated with the above for centuries. I agree it is not the best word to describe what I meant, but it is the most concise one. Faith, awareness, quantum consciousness etc. are the most appropriate words, of course, but you understand what I mean, right?