InTrade has a new Depression Trade!

Discussion in 'Trading' started by Random.Capital, Jan 18, 2009.

  1. I noticed after I posted that it was real GDP, but didn't bother editing. Unless you're talking about something else?
     
    #11     Jan 18, 2009
  2. Mercor

    Mercor

    You see a sure thing?
     
    #12     Jan 18, 2009
  3. I checked back on the site to see what it was priced and it had actually increased. I figured that if it was that obvious then it should have went the other way.

    Oops.

    I actually went to the table 1.1.1 to look at what #s they are using and it looks like the only error on that is how they are adding up the four quarterly percentage change #s.

    If they applied the same logic to 2006 it would be:
    4.8 2.7 0.8 1.5 +
    which would come out to an incorect +9.8% real gdp
     
    #13     Jan 20, 2009
  4. Bond_Trader's an idiot. If he posts something wrong...he meant it. He's a moron
     
    #14     Jan 20, 2009
  5. I suppose this thread is an interesting indicator of intelligence on ET.

    On the one hand, maybe a lot of people spotted it but couldn't be bothered to point it out.


    The mistake is here:

    If these annualised figures add up to more than -10.0% over four consecutive quarters then the contract will expire at 100.
     
    #15     Jan 20, 2009