Internet Kill-Switch bill sneaking through Congress - it's for your own good

you still haven't told me how steel can melt at 1500 F

how buildings that are not rigged with explosives can fall at free fall speed(which nist admits)

how the scientific community accepts the peer review paper of thermite discovery.

how 6 of people on 911 commission publicly state that the report was a whitewash

why do you keep trying to politicize this it has nothing to do with politics only science and physics. what politician are involved is irrelevant. It certainly doesn't make the physical evidence less true

you seem to be stuck on the political aspect try to put your transparent biases asides and just focus on the facts

you sound exactly like john gross

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/v36bkCB8sTY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/v36bkCB8sTY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

now somebody who cared about the truth, would ask that the evidence of molten steel be disclosed to him, but he could care less about the truth unless it fits his preconceived theory. Which is intellectual dishonest


so you can waste time posting ridicules crazy talk about how everybodies out to get your boy, but not provide one piece of information in contrary to the above
evidence

I have used google to provide you with the information above. Let see if you can use it

also keep in mind that attacking me is useless I did not produce or influence and of the information above.

I guess the 911 commission personnel are crazy too

 

The same people that believe this kind of 9-11 crap are the same people that believe in the big bang theory.

 

As usual you have it backwards... this has nothing to do with science and everything to do with politics.

The "whitewash" comments were about not including political factors in the report, such as the extent to which U.S. policies might have motivated the attackers.

Your fruitcake theory never gained traction because it's laughable and the civil engineering establishment rejected it. I can also post videos of doctors who claim herbs will cure cancer.

 

More like, they believe the moon landings were faked and Elvis is still alive.

 

LOL, what?? That comment deserves its own thread and some explanation.

 

in typical dishonest fashion you took the least condemning and treated it as the only one

The chair and vice chair of the 9/11 Commission, respectively Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, assert in their book, Without Precedent, that they were "set up to fail" and were starved of funds to do a proper investigation. They also confirm that they were denied access to the truth and misled by senior officials in the Pentagon and the federal aviation authority; and that this obstruction and deception led them to contemplate slapping officials with criminal charges.

a little more than "political factors" would you say

In a 2006 interview with anchorman Evan Soloman of CBC's Sunday programme, the vice chair of the 9/11 Commission, Lee Hamilton, was reminded that the commission report failed to even mention the collapse of WTC7 or the suspicious hurried removal of the building debris from the site - before there could be a proper forensic investigation of what was a crime scene. Hamilton could only offer the lame excuse that the commissioners did not have "unlimited time" and could not be expected to answer "every question" the public asks.


i guess he believes as you that a spontaneous free fall collapse is such a common occurrence that it isn't worth mentioning (hint it has never happened before) so basically ignore a first ever event which defies physics.

over 1200 engineers have signed a petition saying the official story is false

http://www.ae911truth.org/

http://world911truth.org/open-letter-to-nist-by-richard-gage/


http://www.metroactive.com/metro/09.09.09/cover-0936.html

 

you haven't posted anything of substance from the begining

unless you consider elvis, moon landing , john lenien, bush hating media. scientific evidence

 

Bronx firefighter and recovery worker Joe “Toolie” O’Toole remembered “seeing a crane lift a steel beam vertically from deep within the catacombs of Ground Zero. ‘It was dripping from the molten steel,’ he said.” (Jennifer Lin, “Recovery Worker Reflects On Months Spent At Ground Zero,” Knight Ridder Newspapers, May 29,


“In the first few weeks, sometimes when a worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of the beam would be dripping molten steel,” said Greg Fuchek, vice president of sales for LinksPoint Inc., maker of the GlobalPoint Global Positioning System receiver used to track debris and/or human remains recovery locations in the pile. (Trudy Walsh, “Handheld App Eased Recovery Tasks,” Government Computer News, Vol. 21 No. 27 a, 9/11/2002.

“I saw melting of girders in World Trade Center.” – Structural Engineer Abolhassan Astaneh at http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/science/jan-june07/overpass_05-10.html


“Turner himself crawled through an opening and down crumpled stairwells to the subway, five levels below ground. He remembers seeing in the darkness a distant, pinkish glow–molten metal dripping from a beam–but found no signs of life.” – Marci McDonald, “They came to help at Ground Zero. What they experienced they can’t forget” http://www.usnews.com/usnews/9_11/articles/911memories.htm


Now let’s hear from the only real journalist given unrestricted access to Ground Zero for the duration of the “cleanup.” He was below the surface of “the pile,” exploring with engineers on more than one occasion. Here he mentions “…the rattle of cascading debris, the ominous groaning of weakened structures overhead, or, in the early days, the streams of molten metal that leaked from the hot cores and flowed down broken walls inside the foundation hole.”

- William Langewiesche, American Ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center, North Point Press, New York, 2002, p. 32


Describing a speaking appearance by Leslie Robertson (structural engineer who worked on the World Trade Center), at the National Council of Structural Engineers Associations 9th Annual Conference, one source wrote, “As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running.” (James Williams, “SEAUNEWS, The Newsletter of the Structural Engineers Association of Utah,” October 2001, p. 3. Source file expired: -http://www.seau.org/SEAUNews-2001-10.pdf. Articles quoting this source include: http://wtc.nist.gov/media/AE911Truth-NIST-Written-Submission12-18-07.pdf and http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/moltensteel.html

“The temperature at the core of ‘the pile,’ is near 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, according to fire officials.” http://web.archive.org/web/20010918...sections/us/DailyNews/WTC_recovery010918.html

A combination of an uncontrolled fire and the structural damage might have been able to bring the building down, some engineers said. But that would not explain steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures, Dr. Barnett said.

- James Glanz, “Engineers Suspect Diesel Fuel in Collapse of 7 World Trade Center,” NY Times, Nov. 29, 2001, at http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/29/nyregion/29TOWE.html

NIST does not believe in crazy conspiracies like i witness testimony



NIST why do you ignore evidence

 

ROTFLMAO!!!! There you go again pretending it defies physics. If that was true then why did the Bush-hating media totally drop the ball on what would be the story of the century?

 

The only point you have is the one on top of your head