TWS is essentially a trading platform kit, which starts out looking like a spreadsheet, and can be warped and woven into some very different trading profiles, all depending on the time/effort that the individual traders/institutions wish to employ. Moreover, there are generally two or three different ways to do things -- whether constructing portfolios or the actions of trading -- such that two persons attempting to work on the other's platform may look at each other, befuddled, and ask, "What've you done here??" If you don't like the way your TWS looks/acts, I'd look in the mirror.
Interesting to read their judgement criteria. The article has nine paragraphs. Only one of it relates to TWS. They seem to judge IB on a much wider scope. Whereas here on ET the discussion is almost entirely about TWS only. Not only in this thread, but in all threads about IB.
I haven't encountered any of those issues that you describe. On the average day, I probably put on 5 to 10 trades. I don't day trade and never have any issues finding high probability of profit trades or hedges to put on. So no, don't assume that I just trade for the sake of trading. In any case, it sounds like IB is not for you. What broker are you currently using?
Well since we are all TRADERS so it's natural that we would be most interested in the TRADING platform of IB, TWS which is what we use daily to TRADE. What else is there about IB, besides its cost and customer service that we would be interested in? I don't know about the other nine criteria because I can't read the article, but I have a suspicion that they were all criteria that IB would easily score high in but bears little relevance to traders. That's probably why IB is always ranked "top" every single year.
While I have some issues with tws, there is NO 30 second delay, or even a 1 second delay. Talking nonsense.
Take a look at what @truetype posted and I quoted. That seems to be the original article at Barron's.
To be fair, I am having issues with IB WebTrader this morning. It's very slow right now. Also, quotes under the AMZN option chain were wrong. Rarely have that issue though.