Intelligent Design is not creationism

and u and zizzz are still on square 0

 

See below...

Uh hummmm...riiiiiiight.

 

With any mutation effecting the fertility of an individual within either AA or BB, there is now a new group CC composed of only that member.

That's the takeaway.

 

The only "member" that's been taken away here is the one between your legs.

 

how about this john? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3790531.stm

 

Ah yes, the surest sign of an ass-kicking thoroughly received:

The bitchy ad hominem comeback.

 

or this? http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/12/031208141435.htm

jampy's only got questions, no responses... same as zizzz... lets be kind bro

 

Whatever.

 

and here are more examples just for fun http://news.softpedia.com/news/Experimental-Evidence-for-the-Appearance-of-New-Species-40812.shtml

john - all jampy and zizzz gained is irritating you thanks to a skilfull use of bad faith... ever heard of "Teach the Controversy"? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teach_the_Controversy

still waiting for jampy, or zizzz, to show some balls though... basically not a single one of jampy's assertions stands true... game, bible boys?

 

Still waiting for you to prove your claim that everyone who supports ID in these threads is a single personality...