Intelligent Design is not creationism

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Teleologist, Nov 4, 2006.

  1. lol.... you must have missed the last 100 or so posts in this thread.

    ID'er after getting hammered in this thread:

    (I can't hear you I can't hear you I can't hear you)

    It's very satisfying to see ID debunked here. This propaganda effort conceived by radical religionists as a way to remake society in a manner 'more consonant with theistic ideals' belongs on the scrap heap along with any number of other similarly pseudo-scientific theories.

    Once the ID'ers have slunk back into their grottos with their incense and chants, we can resume the debate about the origin of life on earth.

    By the way Z... the multiple alias thing is not working.
     
    #841     Nov 29, 2006
  2. yo mama
     
    #842     Nov 29, 2006
  3. ok i'll concede that one ;-) just cldn't resist it
     
    #843     Nov 29, 2006
  4. What are the two species?
     
    #844     Nov 29, 2006
  5. i'll take a stab at it... the often misunderstood "jackalope"?

    edit: and don't forget bigfoot
     
    #845     Nov 29, 2006
  6. #846     Nov 29, 2006
  7. And, away we go...

    Define "species."
     
    #847     Nov 29, 2006
  8. Hybridization is a dead-end process. It doesn't get you evolution, not even close.

    A species is a set of inter-fertile members.
     
    #848     Nov 29, 2006
  9. and since when are hybrids systematically infertile??
     
    #849     Nov 29, 2006
  10. OK, now define "confirmed."

    And, while we're at it, define "evolved."

    Be careful to leave yourself an out. If you don't, I'm gonna hand you your ass.
     
    #850     Nov 29, 2006