Intelligent Design is not creationism

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Teleologist, Nov 4, 2006.

  1. Yes, I could. But I, and reality, are on ignore so far.

    Jesus
     
    #832     Nov 29, 2006
  2. A scientific theory certainly does have to concern itself with interpretations of evidence.

    So, where is the observation that allows "evolution" to the exclusion of all competing explanations.
     
    #833     Nov 29, 2006
  3. Often.
     
    #834     Nov 29, 2006
  4. your humor is divine. how did i miss this thread for so long? oh wait, i know now... john dough, 2penny, tradernicole, and ZZZzzzzz plus aliases'. :eek:
     
    #835     Nov 29, 2006
  5. which explanations? IS, flying spaghetti monster theologies?
     
    #836     Nov 29, 2006
  6. Z, I would think it enough that you post this bogus argument continuously under your regular alias, that you wouldn't have to start whining about it under this one, too.
     
    #837     Nov 29, 2006
  7. well i'll be a monkey's uncle.
     
    #838     Nov 29, 2006
  8. wldn't surprise anybody if u were caught shagging a chimp... thats for sure...
     
    #839     Nov 29, 2006
  9. Too much irony.

    Where has your "evolution" theory produced a single confirmed instance of two species where one evolved from the other?
     
    #840     Nov 29, 2006