this is A+... also a relief to see you posting excellent material again... and i don't mean dawkins... i mean bishop harries... no need for conflict between science and religion, spirituality...
Teleologist said: James Bond replied: Nice dodge. If you really had any evidence that Darwinism has contributed anything to advance the field of medicine you would have provided it rather than engage in ad hominem attacks.
If an idiot shouts 2+2=6 on the street, what do you think the proper response to him should be? Prove to him that 2+2=4? BTW, I've started another thread on evolution. If you want to see evidence of evolution go read that thread.
..........now, the last thing we would expect from this religious mystic would be to accuse someone else of trying to dodge anything, considering this incredibly dishonest combination of assertion/denial. However, this is not the world of the expected... this is the world of the believers, where anything goes, where appeal to authority equals fact, where believers are allowed to claim that they have scientific proof of ID/Creation and then out of the other side of their mouth claim that the scientific method is based on falsehoods. Can you believe that he actually accuses someone else of 'dodging the question'?? The answer - yes, it's all too believable.
TraderNik wrote: More lies. I said that one could build a circumstantial case based on subtle clues that the first cells were products of bioengineering. But you ID critics want "overwhelming evidence" and that translates to "show us the designer designing." If you are ever willing to settle for something less than that let me know.
When we asked for such data that you claimed to support a design inference (while not ruling out a non-design inference, as you claimed), you dodged every time. Compare your two posts and you know who's lying.
Well, well... it seems that Telologist has deleted his post, jb! Hmmm... I wonder why that is. Possibly because he knows that his outrageous lies will be easily refuted. and then, when challenged... :eek: Amazing!! These people seem unaware that all posts are archived and can be found by searching!! Empirical data... subtle clues... but hey, who's counting? Thread Closed.
TraderNik, What post did I delete? And show where I said this: "I never said that I had empirical data to support the inference that the first cells were designed".