Z... I read your fumbling attempt to use the word 'karma' in a sentence, a few posts above this one. You were holding forth on the topic of Buddhism. You have appeared to be an idiot many times on these boards, but perhaps never as thoroughly as you did when you started pretending you knew what you were talking about re: Buddhism. One good thing is this: after I hammered you into the ground regarding the contradictions between the charges you level at others and the infantile behaviour you yourself exhibit, you have stopped posting child-like images of bunny rabbits and other weird shit from your personal image library, something you used to do whenever your arguments started to become too circular or your assertions were laid out for everyone to see, as they have been by stu here. Remember, when Z starts using LOL a lot and using the word 'pathetic', it means "I am getting uncomfortable and I want to change the subject'. You can thank me for this anytime, zEvader. ________________________________________ Member of the ET Anti-Troll Brigade iustus ignarus troll
Okay, I've lost track of why Buddhism has been brought into the debate over ID. For the sake of argument let's say that Buddhism is incompatible with ID. So what?
Guys, If there was an all powerfull being, we'd know it by now. The Dichotomy: All powerful, all good. OK, explain sub Sahara Africa and wars in general. The omnipotent/beneficial thing is done to death. If you believe in God, then maybe he will help your trading accts?
Your POV is that of a westerner thinking of God and man. The eastern point of view has the POV of nothing but a 100% fair system of cause and effect...
Why should he? Oh yeah, I forced you to post your cut and paste job regarding Buddhism, I force stu to go off on his tangents, and I forced the clones to practice their "ignoring of trolls." In any case, ID, as I refer to ID is non denominational, as it is not representative of any particular religion or religious belief system, and no one has shown that statement to be false. I didn't introduce Buddhism into the debate, that canard was the birth of one of the resident atheist/ignorant chance supporters. The ID I refer to doesn't even require God or gods, it simply requires intelligence behind what we see, by design, not random ignorant chance.
Stick around. I am explaining this. Briefly, this world is not for the knowing of God. It is an attempt to unknow Him in every way, shape and form going all the way back to before a "big bang". Everything here is meant to deceive you. When you consider that the deception is self-deception and that the self is omnipotent, you can understand why you are slow to figure it out. When an omnipotent will splits itself into separate allegiances, separate goals, the result is tyranny and imprisonment. Not to worry. As it is only you who can imprison yourself, the power of decision is still with you to free yourself. That is all you have left of your omnipotence, and all you need to have it restored. Jesus
Yes it's rediculous because all are "the Buddha" and all are "Christ". And "Christ" and "the Buddha" are different symbols for the same reality. It is quite possible to see "the Buddha" or "the face of Christ" in everyone, because that is who they are at the level of reality. If you can see anything other than this, it is you who are the "fake". To see bodies is to see "fakes", and it is only possible to see what you think you are. You can only think you are not the Christ or the Buddha. But you cannot change your reality with such thoughts. All attempts to distinguish Christ from Christ or Buddha from Buddha are attempts to separate Oneness and make fakes instead. Any attempt to do so shows the fake-i-ness of the faking fakers...so to speak. Jesus