I responded to your post not Teologist's post. I did not ever believe it was directed at me, as it was in response to Teologist, but as it was not an ET PM, and as it was posted in the forum and all who read the posts are able to read and respond, therefore, it is open game to respond... If you want private conversation, try the PM function... Your claim that I am Teologist is false, no matter how often you repeat the falsehood...
lmao... splashing about but still sinking. Z steps in it once again. Let's see how long it takes ZTroll to start bellowing about anal penetration.
If you didn't believe it was directed at you, then why did you bother telling me that you're not a creationist? No, there's no misconstruing your intent. You thought that I was suggesting that you were a creationist when I was discussing ID being hijacked by the creationists, because Teleologist throughout the thread had repeatedly stated that he was not a creationist, and so when you specifically told me that you were not a creationist, you were answering as if you were Telelogist...only you were logged in as ZZZzzzzzzz. Give it up. You've been outed. You and Teleologist are one and the same.
(click....whirrrrr) Translation: "kjkent1 has provided proof that I am posting under an alias. Now, this isn't a surprise to anyone, since I have been banned from this site at least 3 times in the past and have re-appeared under a different username every time. Also, I have posted under aliases subsequent to the debut of the latest ZTroll personna. The problem with kj's outing me is that it makes me look like an idiot with no life. At an average of 86 posts per day, it is hard to claim that I have a life. This outing sucks because it is very tough for me to maintain the illusion that people here respect me when everyone is laughing at me". (click.....whirrrrr)
bah... this is just P&R, virtual personas etc... why not just refute / expose the stupidities proferred by such & such poster, cited person etc? and move on if all the incriminated poster is able to do is simply repeat the same stupid things over and over again... its not like the last one who posts 'win' or sthg... or is it?
I told you I am not a creationist, because I am not one. Said the same thing to Thunderdog that I am not a creationist. I am also not Teologist, no matter how much you continue to falsely claim that I am. You cast a very wide net with your criticisms of ID, paint fingerprint style strokes with your opinions, and I am just letting it be know, again and again if necessary, that I am not a creationist...at least in the manner that the term is thrown around. I am not a Christian, so any categorization of ID supporters as necessarily Christian Bible folks is false, just as false as your claim that I am Teologist...as I am not. Yes, you have very much misconstrued my intent, obviously...for reasons to distract away from your gaffs in this thread is my guess. I support the concept that this the universe is not the product of ignorant chance, nor is life the product of some unguided unprogrammed random processes, so people lump me in with the creationists, which is a false claim when directed toward those who support the concept of ID over ignorant chance...but they are not necessarily creationists nor Christians because they support an intelligently designed and programmed universe.... You obviously think that repeating a falsehood makes it true, but you are very, very wrong... False accusations, this is what type of approach you take? Pathetic...a repetitive and non random pattern on your part, such pathetic efforts at red herrings, false ones at that... As far as giving it up, you can give up your false claims and ridiculous red herrings and just deal with the topic at hand...which is ID is not creationism.